Supply chain best practices to improve bottle-to-bottle circularity of PET: Case evidence from the beverage industry
Abstract
Bottle-to-bottle circularity of PET (polyethylene terephthalate) has gained significant attention in the beverage industry globally as a prospective response to unsustainable manufacturing and consumption. PET has been the polymer of choice for packaging of beverages for many decades owing to its functionality, resistance, safety, and lightweight properties. However, it has also created an environmental challenge as it has found its way to the landfill due to a lack of consumer awareness, robust collect-back mechanisms, and recycling options. Following the call of environmentalists, government legislations, and vigilante consumers, there is a conscious effort by the beverage manufacturers to move away from the traditional concept of “source-make-use-dispose” to design PET bottles with fewer resources, collect and recycle PET waste to avoid landfills. Bottle-to-bottle circularity of PET has two important processes: 1) design creation with minimal resource utilization in the forward logistics and 2) the 3Rs: recycle, reuse and recover in the reverse logistics. The academic literature on bottle-to-bottle circularity is nascent and focuses largely on the individual processes of the closed loop rather than considering them in conjunction or viewing them through the lens of supply chain management. This study adopts a supply chain management theoretical approach to understand the critical processes in the PET bottle-to-bottle circularity chain. A case study methodology has been adopted to analyze best practices adopted by three FMCG giants in recent years to improve their PET bottle design (without compromising on the material composition and quality), sorting and recycling mechanisms post-consumption, and finally incorporating the recycled PET in the new bottle design to close the loop. This study makes an important practical contribution, as the best practices highlighted in the paper can be adopted by other beverage manufacturers in the developing countries where sorting mechanisms and recycling options and technology are not well developed. It also fulfills the underlying principles of SDG (The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), introduced by the United Nations in 2015, provide a comprehensive framework to balance economic growth, social inclusivity, and environmental preservation—fundamental principles of sustainability.) 9 and 12 that emphasize innovation and infrastructure development in industry to promote sustainable production and consumption.
References
1. Massey S, Cloutier P, Sanche L, et al. Mass spectrometry investigation of the degradation of polyethylene terephtalate induced by low-energy (<100eV) electrons. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2008; 77(7): 889-897. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2008.01.002
2. Wang Z, Wang Q, Chen B, et al. Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of multiple stakeholders in E-waste recycling industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2020; 155: 104618. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104618
3. Ahn KH. Main contents and implications of the 2023 revision of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises*. Journal of International Logistics and Trade. 2024; 22(2): 80-92. doi: 10.1108/jilt-12-2023-0081
4. Brooks A, Jambeck J, Mozo-Reyes E. Plastic Waste Management and Leakage in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank; 2020.
5. Zhang H, Wen ZG. The consumption and recycling collection system of PET bottles: A case study of Beijing, China. Waste Management. 2014; 34(6): 987-998. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.015
6. Pinter E, Welle F, Mayrhofer E, et al. Circularity Study on PET Bottle-To-Bottle Recycling. Sustainability. 2021; 13(13): 7370. doi: 10.3390/su13137370
7. ARKEMA. Arkema joined the circular economy network of the Ellen Mac Arthur foundation. ARKEMA; 2025.
8. Okorie O, Charnley F, Russell J, et al. Circular business models in high value manufacturing: Five industry cases to bridge theory and practice. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021; 30(4): 1780-1802. doi: 10.1002/bse.2715
9. Topuz E. Integration of ecotoxicity assessment with product design for circularity management. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2022; 18(2): 305-307. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4580
10. Plascene 2025. Available online: https://www.plascene.com/packaging-procurement-in-the-food-and-beverage-industry-for-2025 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
11. Brouwer MT, Alvarado Chacon F, Thoden van Velzen EU. Effect of recycled content and rPET quality on the properties of PET bottles, part III: Modelling of repetitive recycling. Packaging Technology and Science. 2020; 33(9): 373-383. doi: 10.1002/pts.2489
12. Arruda EH, Melatto RAPB, Levy W, et al. Circular economy: A brief literature review (2015–2020). Sustainable Operations and Computers. 2021; 2: 79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2021.05.001
13. Retamal M, Panandiker AP, Talwar S, et al. Circular business models for plastics in India. India – Australia Industry and Research Collaboration for Reducing Plastic Waste; 2021.
14. Chilton T, Burnley S, Nesaratnam S. A life cycle assessment of the closed-loop recycling and thermal recovery of post-consumer PET. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2010; 54(12): 1241-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.002
15. Foolmaun RK, Ramjeawon T. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of PET bottles and comparative LCA of three disposal options in Mauritius. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management. 2008; 2(1/2): 125. doi: 10.1504/ijewm.2008.016997
16. Song HS, Hyun JC. A study on the comparison of the various waste management scenarios for PET bottles using the life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 1999; 27(3): 267-284.
17. Plastics - the Facts 2018. 2025. Avilable online: https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2018-Plastics-the-facts.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
18. Zhang R, Ma X, Shen X, et al. PET bottles recycling in China: An LCA coupled with LCC case study of blanket production made of waste PET bottles. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020; 260: 110062. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110062
19. Aizenshtein EM. Present and future polyethylene terephthalate fibres*. Fibre Chemistry. 2013; 45(3): 125-132. doi: 10.1007/s10692-013-9495-z
20. Damayanti, Wu HS. Strategic Possibility Routes of Recycled PET. Polymers. 2021; 13(9): 1475. doi: 10.3390/polym13091475
21. Zhou K, Qin L, Juan F, et al. Comprehensive environmental performance of bottle-to-bottle recycling of PET bottles based on deposit-refund system in China. Waste Management. 2023; 172(2023): 90-100.
22. Ncube A, Borodin Y. Life Cycle Assessment of polyethylene terephthalate bottle. 2012 7th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST). Published online September 2012: 1-6. doi: 10.1109/ifost.2012.6357497
23. Nkwachukwu O, Chima C, Ikenna A, et al. Focus on potential environmental issues on plastic world towards a sustainable plastic recycling in developing countries. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry. 2013; 4(1): 34. doi: 10.1186/2228-5547-4-34
24. Benyathiar P, Kumar P, Carpenter G, et al. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Bottle-to-Bottle Recycling for the Beverage Industry: A Review. Polymers. 2022; 14(12): 2366. doi: 10.3390/polym14122366
25. Apotheker S. Curbside collection: complete separation versus commingled collection. Resource Recycling. 1990; 9(10): 58-63.
26. Apotheker S. Finding a formula for successful recycling collection. Resource Recycling. 1992; 11(10): 28-39.
27. Al-Salem SM, Lettieri P, Baeyens J. Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review. Waste Management. 2009; 29(10): 2625-2643. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.004
28. Welle F. Twenty years of PET bottle to bottle recycling—An overview. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2011; 55(11): 865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.009
29. Geyer R. A brief history of plastics. In: Mare plasticum-the plastic Sea: Combatting plastic pollution through science and art. Springer; 2020.
30. Yuan HP, Shen LY, Hao JJL, et al. A model for cost–benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2011; 55(6): 604-612. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.004
31. Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
32. Stuart I, McCutcheon D, Handfield R. Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective. Journal of Operations Management. 2002; 20(5): 419-433.
33. Eisenhardt KM. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review. 1989; 14(4): 532. doi: 10.2307/258557
34. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal. 2007; 50(1): 25-32. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
35. Kato T, Endo Y, Fujiwara S, et al. Balancing the environment and customer value: evaluation of the attractiveness of label-free plastic bottles for green tea. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2023; 36(6): 1429-1441. doi: 10.1108/apjml-09-2023-0825
36. Welle F. Is PET bottle-to-bottle recycling safe? Evaluation of post-consumer recycling processes according to the EFSA guidelines. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2013; 73: 41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.012
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.