Ergonomic study of visitors in red cultural venues from a biomechanical perspective: A case study of students from Sichuan University of Arts and Science
Abstract
Red cultural venues are pivotal in preserving China’s revolutionary heritage and fostering national identity. However, these venues often encounter difficulties in engaging contemporary audiences, particularly younger visitors who seek more interactive and technologically enriched experiences. This study investigates the ergonomic and biomechanical challenges faced by young visitors, using students from the ideological and political education program and the cultural industry management program at Sichuan University of Arts and Science as a representative case study. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative surveys with 200 participants and qualitative interviews with 30 participants to assess physical discomfort and engagement levels. Statistical analysis reveals that prolonged standing significantly increases discomfort (β = 0.04, p < 0.001), while higher levels of interactive engagement (β = −0.30, p = 0.002) and overall satisfaction (β = −0.20, p = 0.013) are associated with reduced discomfort. Thematic analysis identifies key issues such as leg fatigue, back pain, limited interactivity, and restrictive venue layouts. Based on these findings, the study recommends enhancing interactive exhibits, optimizing spatial layouts, providing additional seating, and expanding venue spaces to improve visitor comfort and engagement. These evidence-based recommendations aim to inform the redesign of red cultural venues, making them more accessible and enjoyable for young visitors, thereby enhancing their educational and cultural impact. This research contributes to the limited literature on ergonomics in cultural venue settings and offers practical implications for improving the accessibility and user-friendliness of heritage sites.
References
1. Smith J, Brown T, Davis R. The role of ergonomics in enhancing visitor engagement in cultural venues. Journal of Cultural Studies. 2018.
2. Smith J, et al. Spatial layout and visitor flow in museum design. Museum Studies Journal. 2019;45(3):45–59.
3. Lee Y, Park M. The impact of interactive displays on visitor engagement in museums. Journal of Museum Design. 2020;12(1):112–118.
4. Kumar S, et al. Musculoskeletal discomfort in museum visitors: A study of visitor posture. Ergonomics Review. 2017;38(2):88–94.
5. Hernandez R, Thompson D. Biomechanics of museum visitors: Effects of standing and walking. Human Factors. 2016;58(4):567–577.
6. Zhang T, Wang L. Visitor engagement in cultural heritage sites: Addressing ergonomic challenges. International Journal of Museum Design. 2021;7(1):25–39.
7. Kumar S, et al. Musculoskeletal strain from interactive exhibits in museums. Ergonomics in Design. 2018;26(3):35–42.
8. Lampe D, Deml B. Increasing physical activity in the vehicle with an interactive seating system in a male sample. Ergonomics. 2023;66(4):536–553. doi:10.1080/00140139.2022.2098384.
9. Zalay AA. The bersila workstation: A new school furniture concept. Available online: https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/The_bersila_workstation_a_new_school_furniture_concept/23206379?file=40903145 (accessed on 2 June 2024).
10. Zhang Z, Wang J, Liu Y. The integration of biomechanics and ergonomics in museum exhibition design: A mixed-method approach. Museum Studies Journal. 2020;22(4):230–243.
11. Kumar P, Sharma S, Gupta R. Bio-mechanical analysis of visitor flow and physical strain in cultural venues: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Human Factors in Ergonomics. 2021;18(3):125–137.
12. Hernandez J, Thompson R. Analyzing visitor comfort and engagement in museum environments using mixed methods. International Journal of Museum Studies. 2022;5(2):58–71.
13. Suhud U, Allan M, Wibowo LA, Sulistyowati R. Predicting the role of motivation, sensation-seeking, and constraints in shaping visitors’ intention and stage of readiness to visit a folk theatre. Business Review. 2023;8(10):3653.
14. Kang S, Kim KB. Sustainability for the festival policy: Focused on community and visitors. Global Business and Finance Review. 2023;28(1):72.
15. Kennedy LA, Isazad M, Mashinchi M. “The worst has already happened”: Communicating sensitively with bereaved survey participants. European Journal of Public Health. 2023;33.
16. Lopes P, Carbinatto M. Gymnastics for All and popular culture: (Re)cognition and appreciation of popular manifestations (Portuguese). Conexões. 2023;20:8670839.
17. Beardsley M, Jung S, Kim HL, Kim YS. Tourism experiences during a convention: A case study from South Korea. Tourism Management. 2019;40(3):123–134.
18. Bamashmous FOM. “Furniture that Celebrates the Past”: Exploring the Nostalgia-Evoking Seating Design on the Purchasing Behavior of Saudi Arabian Millennials in a Case Study of the Exhibition [PhD thesis]. Arizona State University; 2024.
19. Martindale KA, Design U. Ergonomics in sport venues: Methods for improving visitor experience and comfort. In: Sport and the City: The Role of Sport in Urban Development. 2011.
20. Zhang Z, Wang J. Redesigning museum exhibits for improved physical comfort: A focus on ergonomic principles. Journal of Museum Studies. 2019.
21. Hernandez J, Thompson R. The effects of physical strain on museum visitors: A biomechanical study. Journal of Physical Therapy. 2021.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yang Gao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
