Impact of indoor building air microplastics on human living environment health: A biomechanical perspective

  • Jingzhang Liang Xiangxi Vocational and Technical College for Nationalities, Jishou 416000, China
  • Liang Zhou Xiangxi Vocational and Technical College for Nationalities, Jishou 416000, China
  • Qishun Wang Hunan Academy of Transportation Sciences Co., Ltd., Changsha 410014, China
  • Yong Tian Xiangxi Vocational and Technical College for Nationalities, Jishou 416000, China
  • Ting Tian Xiangxi Vocational and Technical College for Nationalities, Jishou 416000, China
  • Hongjia Xiang Xiangxi Vocational and Technical College for Nationalities, Jishou 416000, China
Keywords: indoor architecture; biomechanics; air microplastics; living environment; health impact; rubber
Article ID: 1371

Abstract

Introduction: Microplastics are plastic particles less than 5 mm in diameter, mainly from synthetic textiles, home decoration materials, cleaning supplies and plastic products wear. These microplastics can enter the body through respiratory inhalation, skin contact or dietary ingestion, posing a potential threat to human health. Studies have found that inhaling microplastics can trigger respiratory inflammation, allergic reactions, and even chronic respiratory diseases (such as bronchitis and asthma). Microplastic particles can accumulate in the lungs, and long-term exposure can exacerbate respiratory diseases. In addition, microplastics may also enter other organs through the blood circulation, affecting the immune system and nervous system function. In the indoor environment, the release of microplastics is closely related to daily activities, with higher concentrations of microplastics in high-frequency activity areas (such as living rooms) and greater exposure risks. Therefore, the health effects of indoor microplastic pollution on long-term residents should not be ignored, and further research on its long-term health effects and measures to reduce exposure risks are needed. Objectives: To precisely determine the concentration levels of microplastics in indoor air and comprehensively assess their potential risks to human health, with a focus on how these microplastics interact with the biomechanical aspects of the human body. Methods: This study explores the impact of indoor building air microplastics on human environmental health and analyzes the human exposure risk of microplastic distribution in different regions. Results: The results showed that the microplastic content in the living room area was 241 ± 21 n/m3, with the highest content, while the kitchen had the lowest. In the assessment of human exposure risk, subjects had the highest daily and annual exposure levels in the living room, with some experiencing symptoms such as allergies and coughing, indicating moderate exposure risk. The daily average exposure of subjects P1 and P5 could reach 1364MPS/day and 1142MPS/day, with an average annual exposure of 1,124,000 and 1,214,000 particles, respectively. Microplastics in indoor air are mainly small particles of 20–100 microns, mainly in the form of fragments, and synthetic rubber and packaging plastics are the most common types. Health risk assessment shows that individuals exposed to high concentrations of microplastics for a long time are prone to allergies, mild cough and other problems, and exposure time is negatively correlated with health scores. Daily and annual exposure levels varied significantly by region, with the living room highest and the kitchen lowest. Conclusion: The study provides quantitative data on indoor exposure levels of microplastics and provides a scientific basis for assessing their health risks. The potential harm mechanism of microplastics to respiratory tract was revealed from the perspective of biomechanics, which filled the research gap. The seriousness of microplastic pollution in indoor environment was emphasized, which provided reference for formulating indoor environmental quality standards and health protection measures. To remind the public to pay attention to the problem of indoor microplastic pollution, especially in high-frequency activity areas, such as living rooms, measures should be taken to reduce the release and accumulation of microplastics.

References

1. Abdollahzadeh N, Farahani AV, Soleimani K, et al. Indoor environmental quality improvement of student dormitories in Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 2022; 41(1): 258-278. doi: 10.1108/ijbpa-09-2021-0128

2. Ageel HK, Harrad S, Abdallah MAE. Occurrence, human exposure, and risk of microplastics in the indoor environment. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2022; 24(1): 17-31. doi: 10.1039/d1em00301a

3. Hale RC, King AE, Ramirez JM, et al. Durable Plastic Goods: A Source of Microplastics and Chemical Additives in the Built and Natural Environments. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 2022; 9(10): 798-807. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00417

4. Zhou D, Luo H, Zhang F, et al. Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of the Persistent PET Fiber-Based Microplastics over Pt Nanoparticles Decorated N-Doped TiO2 Nanoflowers. Advanced Fiber Materials. 2022; 4(5): 1094-1107. doi: 10.1007/s42765-022-00149-4

5. Kuttykattil A, Raju S, Vanka KS, et al. Consuming microplastics? Investigation of commercial salts as a source of microplastics (MPs) in diet. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 30(1): 930-942. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22101-0

6. Hussain KA, Romanova S, Okur I, et al. Assessing the Release of Microplastics and Nanoplastics from Plastic Containers and Reusable Food Pouches: Implications for Human Health. Environmental Science & Technology. 2023; 57(26): 9782-9792. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01942

7. Sun A, Wang WX. Human Exposure to Microplastics and Its Associated Health Risks. Environment & Health. 2023; 1(3): 139-149. doi: 10.1021/envhealth.3c00053

8. Chen X juan, Ma J jin, Yu R lian, et al. Bioaccessibility of microplastic-associated heavy metals using an in vitro digestion model and its implications for human health risk assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29(51): 76983-76991. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20983-8

9. Fuschi C, Pu H, MacDonell M, et al. Microplastics in the Great Lakes: Environmental, Health, and Socioeconomic Implications and Future Directions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2022; 10(43): 14074-14091. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02896

10. Alak G, Köktürk M, Ucar A, et al. Thermal processing implications on microplastics in rainbow trout fillet. Journal of Food Science. 2022; 87(12): 5455-5466. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16382

11. Allen D, Allen S, Abbasi S, et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in the marine-atmosphere environment. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022; 3(6): 393-405. doi: 10.1038/s43017-022-00292-x

12. Shojaee Barjoee S, Azizi M, Khaledi A, et al. Street dust-bound metal(loid)s in industrial areas of Iran: Moran’s spatial autocorrelation distribution, eco-toxicological risk assessment, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2023; 20(8): 8509-8536. doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-05021-5

13. Cruz LPS, Alves RS, da Rocha FOC, et al. Atmospheric levels, multivariate statistical study, and health risk assessment of odorous compounds (H2S and NH3) in areas near polluted urban rivers in the city of Salvador, in Northeastern Brazil. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health. 2021; 15(1): 159-176. doi: 10.1007/s11869-021-01095-7

14. Mahendran SA, Blackie N, Wathes DC, et al. Comparison of environment quality measurements between 3 types of calf housing in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science. 2023; 106(4): 2461-2474. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22613

15. Sturm MT, Myers E, Schober D, et al. Development of an Inexpensive and Comparable Microplastic Detection Method Using Fluorescent Staining with Novel Nile Red Derivatives. Analytica. 2023; 4(1): 27-44. doi: 10.3390/analytica4010004

16. Hernandez LM, Farner JM, Claveau-Mallet D, et al. Optimizing the Concentration of Nile Red for Screening of Microplastics in Drinking Water. ACS ES&T Water. 2023; 3(4): 1029-1038. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00503

17. Al-Gethami W, Qamar MA, Shariq M, et al. Emerging environmentally friendly bio-based nanocomposites for the efficient removal of dyes and micropollutants from wastewater by adsorption: a comprehensive review. RSC Advances. 2024; 14(4): 2804-2834. doi: 10.1039/d3ra06501d

18. Finnegan A, Süsserott RC, Koh LH, et al. A Simple Sample Preparation Method to Significantly Improve Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectra of Microplastics. Applied Spectroscopy. 2022; 76(7): 783-792. doi: 10.1177/00037028221075065

19. Geng Y, Zhang Z, Zhou W, et al. Individual Exposure to Microplastics through the Inhalation Route: Comparison of Microplastics in Inhaled Indoor Aerosol and Exhaled Breath Air. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 2023; 10(6): 464-470. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00147

20. Cao G, Cai Z. Getting Health Hazards of Inhaled Nano/Microplastics into Focus: Expectations and Challenges. Environmental Science & Technology. 2023; 57(9): 3461-3463. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00029

Published
2025-03-12
How to Cite
Liang, J., Zhou, L., Wang, Q., Tian, Y., Tian, T., & Xiang, H. (2025). Impact of indoor building air microplastics on human living environment health: A biomechanical perspective. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(4), 1371. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1371
Section
Article