Biomechanically driven street environment design for urban regeneration

  • Longqi Gao Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232038, Anhui, China
  • Huihui Zhou Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232038, Anhui, China
  • Miaomiao Zhu Huainan Normal University, Huainan 232038, Anhui, China
Keywords: biomechanics; urban regeneration; street environment design; gait analysis; accessible design
Article ID: 1540

Abstract

This paper proposes a biomechanics-based street environment optimization scheme for urban regeneration, integrating biomechanical principles into urban street designs to enhance pedestrian comfort, safety, and overall health. The approach optimizes sidewalks, barrier-free facilities, public seating, and traffic flow lines, focusing on the biomechanical needs of pedestrians, including gait stability, joint stress, and muscle load. To further validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, additional empirical studies were conducted in diverse urban settings with varying pedestrian densities, surface types, and weather conditions. Simulations were also carried out to predict the scalability and robustness of the design strategies under real-world conditions, ensuring their applicability for future large-scale urban regeneration projects. This practical assessment provides a foundational framework for future urban regeneration projects, particularly in enhancing accessibility and safety for vulnerable groups such as the elderly and people with mobility impairments. Furthermore, these findings contribute to the development of smart cities by integrating biomechanics into urban planning, fostering more sustainable and health-conscious public spaces.

References

1. Zhu M, Zhou W, Hu M, et al. Evaluating the renewal degree for expressway regeneration projects based on a model integrating the fuzzy Delphi method, the Evaluating the renewal degree for expressway regeneration projects based on a model integrating the fuzzy Delphi method, the fuzzy AHP method, and the TOPSIS method. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4): 3769.

2. Liu Y, Hu W, Kasal A, et al. The State of the Art of Biomechanics Applied in Ergonomic Furniture Design. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(22): 12120.

3. Tran M, Gabert L, Hood S, et al. A lightweight robotic leg prosthesis replicating the biomechanics of the knee, ankle, and toe joint. Science robotics. 2022; 7(72): eabo3996.

4. Mofolasayo A. Complete street concept, and ensuring safety of vulnerable road users. Transportation research procedia. 2020; 48: 1142-1165.

5. Gabryelski J, Kurczewski P, Sydor M, et al. Development of transportation for disabled people on the example of wheelchair propulsion with cam-thread drive. Energies. 2021; 14(23): 8137.

6. He H, Gyergyak J. Enlightenment from street art activities in urban public space. Pollack Periodica. 2021; 16(1): 169-175.

7. Egeonu D, Jia B. A systematic literature review of computer vision-based biomechanical models for physical workload estimation. Ergonomics. 2025; 68(2): 139-162.

8. Gatto E, Buccolieri R, Perronace L, et al. The challenge in the management of historic trees in urban environments during climate change: the case of corso trieste (Rome, Italy). Atmosphere. 2021; 12(4): 500.

9. Cyr KM, Segal AD, Neptune RR, et al. Biomechanical responses of individuals with transtibial amputation stepping on a coronally uneven and unpredictable surface. Journal of Biomechanics. 2023; 155: 111622.

10. Leng Y, Lin X, Huang G, et al. Wheel-legged robotic limb to assist human with load carriage: an application for environmental disinfection during COVID-19. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2021; 6(2): 3695-3702.

11. Mohan D. Road safety in less-motorized environments: future concerns. International journal of epidemiology. 2002; 31(3): 527-532.

12. Figueiredo M, Eloy S, Marques S, et al. Older people perceptions on the built environment: a scoping review. Applied ergonomics. 2023; 108: 103951.

13. Du X. Biomechanical perspectives on bio-molecular environmental regulation: Long-term strategies. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics. 2024; 21: 83-83.

14. Franěk M, Režný L. Environmental features influence walking speed: The effect of urban greenery. Land. 2021; 10(5): 459.

15. Rybarczyk G, Ozbil A, Andresen E, et al. Physiological responses to urban design during bicycling: a naturalistic investigation. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behavior. 2020; 68: 79-93.

Published
2025-03-03
How to Cite
Gao, L., Zhou, H., & Zhu, M. (2025). Biomechanically driven street environment design for urban regeneration. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 22(4), 1540. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1540
Section
Article