Machine learning model to study effects of lightweight racket design on elbow and shoulder loading during tennis serve

  • Qing Miao School of Physical Education, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan 467000, China
  • Hongkai Zhou School of Physical Education, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan 467000, China
Keywords: biomechanical impact and analysis; mechanical stresses; elbow and shoulder loading; joint force and moment; kinematic dynamics; tennis racket design; long short-term memory; machine learning
Article ID: 374

Abstract

Tennis is a famous sport in which players perform high-speed, repetitive movements that cause significant load to the shoulder and elbow joints, particularly during tennis serve. Further, the racket design also plays a key role in the efficiency of the player’s performance through the level of mechanical stress that it places on the player’s elbow joints. Therefore, analyzing the biomechanical impact of racket types on the load it renders on elbow and shoulder loading will help optimize the player’s performance and avoid the possibility of risk. However, there are limited studies that are related to the effect of differences in racket mass, balance, and inertia over joint force and moment during the phases of serve. To address this gap, this study employs a Machine Learning (ML)-based model to impact three types of racket such as head-light, even-balanced, and head-heavy, towards joint moments and forces in the shoulder, elbow, and wrist during tennis serves. The kinematic data was collected from eight tennis players, and the collected data was processed using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network to predict joint moments and forces based on racket parameters and segmental kinematics. The results have shown that racket design has an excellent impact on a player’s performance through its impact on shoulder and elbow joints. The head-light racket resulted in a shoulder adduction moment of 9.4 ± 0.8 Nm and a shoulder joint force of 130.2 ± 9.4 N during the acceleration phase, compared to the head-heavy racket, which generated a higher adduction moment of 11.3 ± 1.0 Nm and a shoulder force of 162.3 ± 11.4 N. The even-balanced racket showed intermediate values, with an adduction moment of 10.2 ± 0.9 Nm and a shoulder force of 142.5 ± 9.9 N.

References

1. Mulya G, Lengkana AS, Agustryani R. TennBasTech: A Scientific Approach to Teach Tennis. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences. 2021; 9(6): 1371-1382. doi: 10.13189/saj.2021.090633

2. Israel JS, Loushin SR, Tetzloff SU, et al. Wrist Motion Assessment in Tennis Players using Three-Dimensional Motion Capture and Dynamic Electromyography. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2023; 13(03): 264-271. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777024

3. Patel J, Wallen M. Four Common Upper Body Injuries in Tennis Players: Prevention, Description, and Treatment. Academic Medicine & Surgery. Published online May 1, 2024. doi: 10.62186/001c.117284

4. Oyama S, Prentice WE. Rehabilitation of Elbow Injuries. Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic Training. Published online May 28, 2024: 507-536. doi: 10.4324/9781003526308-22

5. Hibberd E, Myers JB, Pexa B, et al. Rehabilitation of Shoulder Injuries. Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic Training. Published online May 28, 2024: 435-506. doi: 10.4324/9781003526308-21

6. Cádiz Gallardo MP, Pradas de la Fuente F, Moreno-Azze A, et al. Physiological demands of racket sports: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149295

7. Liu S, Wu C, Xiao S, et al. Optimizing young tennis players’ development: Exploring the impact of emerging technologies on training effectiveness and technical skills acquisition. Gu Y, ed. PLOS ONE. 2024; 19(8): e0307882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307882

8. Goislard de Monsabert B, Herbaut A, Cartier T, et al. Electromyography‐informed musculoskeletal modeling provides new insight into hand tendon forces during tennis forehand. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2023; 33(10): 1958-1975. doi: 10.1111/sms.14434

9. Ma X, Yaacob A, Kamalden TFT, & NG YG. To Assess the Impact of Physical Factors on Velocity, Speed, and Accuracy of Tennis Serve. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. 2024; 15(1): 125.

10. Edriss S, Romagnoli C, Caprioli L, et al. The Role of Emergent Technologies in the Dynamic and Kinematic Assessment of Human Movement in Sport and Clinical Applications. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(3): 1012. doi: 10.3390/app14031012

11. De Luigi AJ. The effects on sports performance of technologic advances in sports prostheses and wheelchairs. PM&R. 2024; 16(4): 409-417. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13153

12. Suwannachote N, Imjai T, Wattanapanich C, et al. Experimental and Computer Simulation Studies on Badminton Racquet Strings. Sensors. 2023; 23(13): 5957. doi: 10.3390/s23135957

13. Berhimpong MW, Mangolo EW, Makadada FA, et al. Exploring the impact of drills training and grip strength on tennis serve performance: A factorial experimental design research. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023; 23(11): 3108-3118.

14. Irawan R, Azam M, Rahayu S, et al. Biomechanical Motion of the Tennis Forehand Stroke: Analyzing the Impact on the Ball Speed Using Biofor Analysis Software. Physical Education Theory and Methodology. 2023; 23(6): 918-924. doi: 10.17309/tmfv.2023.6.14

15. Touzard P, Lecomte C, Bideau B, et al. There is no rush to upgrade the tennis racket in young intermediate competitive players: The effects of scaling racket on serve biomechanics and performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104146

16. Liu A, Lin YT, Sundaresan K. View-agnostic Human Exercise Cataloging with Single MmWave Radar. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2024; 8(3): 1-23. doi: 10.1145/3678512

17. Yu H, Tu J, Wang P, et al. Bat Planner: Aggressive Flying Ball Player. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2023; 8(9): 5307-5314. doi: 10.1109/lra.2023.3293355

18. Allen T, Choppin S, Knudson D. A review of tennis racket performance parameters. Sports Engineering. 2015; 19(1): 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12283-014-0167-x

19. Patel H, Lala S, Helfner B, et al. Tennis overuse injuries in the upper extremity. Skeletal Radiology. 2020; 50(4): 629-644. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03634-2

20. Gordon BJ, Dapena J. Contributions of joint rotations to racquet speed in the tennis serve. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2006; 24(1): 31-49. doi: 10.1080/02640410400022045

21. Colomar J, Corbi F, Brich Q, et al. Determinant Physical Factors of Tennis Serve Velocity: A Brief Review. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2022; 17(8): 1159-1169. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0091

22. Fett J, Ulbricht A, Ferrauti A. Impact of Physical Performance and Anthropometric Characteristics on Serve Velocity in Elite Junior Tennis Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2020; 34(1): 192-202. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002641

23. Hayes MJ, Spits DR, Watts DG, et al. Relationship Between Tennis Serve Velocity and Select Performance Measures. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2021; 35(1): 190-197. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002440

24. Cant O. Exploring the effects of ball speed and spin in Grand Slam tennis match-play [PhD thesis]. Victoria University; 2020.

25. Jacquier-Bret J, Gorce P. Kinematics characteristics of key point of interest during tennis serve among tennis players: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2024; 6. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1432030

26. Antúnez R, Hernández F, García J, et al. Relationship Between Motor Variability, Accuracy, and Ball Speed in the Tennis Serve. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2012; 33(2012): 45-53. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0043-3

27. Lo KC, Hsieh YC. Comparison of ball-and-racket impact force in two-handed backhand stroke stances for different-skill-level tennis players. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2016; 15(2): 301.

28. Knudson D, Allen T, Choppin S. Interaction of Tennis Racket Design and Biomechanical Factors. Routledge Handbook of Ergonomics in Sport and Exercise. 2013: 423-435. doi: 10.4324/9780203123355-43

Published
2024-11-05
How to Cite
Miao, Q., & Zhou, H. (2024). Machine learning model to study effects of lightweight racket design on elbow and shoulder loading during tennis serve. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 374. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i2.374
Section
Article