The role of biomechanics in enhancing cognitive function and learning outcomes in English language teaching

  • Shasha Wang Department of Basic Education, Weihai Ocean Vocational College, Rongcheng 264300, China
Keywords: biomechanical interventions; biomechanical principles; physical actions; motor learning; language outcomes; English language teaching; kinesthetic learning
Article ID: 383

Abstract

Language learning, traditionally taught through memory and repetition, often overlooks the role of physical movement in enhancing cognitive and linguistic abilities. Theories like embodied cognition and motor learning suggest that cognitive functions are closely linked to physical actions. Research suggests that posture, gestures, and movement can improve language processing and comprehension. However, the practical integration of biomechanical principles into structured language teaching remains underexplored. Previous studies on gesture-based learning and movement-enhanced vocabulary acquisition indicate potential benefits but lack a comprehensive approach. This study introduces a series of biomechanical interventions in English language teaching, including posture training, movement-based vocabulary learning, sensory-motor integration, and kinesthetic learning techniques. A quasi-experimental design with 115 12–16-year-olds was used for 8 weeks. The experimental group received biomechanical interventions, and the control group received traditional teaching. Cognitive function and language outcomes were assessed pre-and post-assessment. The experimental group showed significant cognitive function improvements, with scores rising from 78.5 ± 5.6 to 89.3 ± 4.8, while the control group showed only a minor change (77.9 ± 5.8 to 80.7 ± 5.5, t = 4.56, p = 0.002, d = 1.78 In the experimental group, vocabulary scores increased from 85.6 ± 7.4 to 92.3 ± 6.2 (t = 3.22, p = 0.008, d = 1.03). Memory improvement correlated strongly with vocabulary acquisition (r = 0.68, p = 0.003). Also, engagement frequency increased (p = 0.004).

References

1. Chen X, Zou D, Xie H, et al. Twenty years of personalized language learning. Educational Technology & Society. 2021; 24(1): 205-222.

2. Wen Y. Augmented reality enhanced cognitive engagement: designing classroom-based collaborative learning activities for young language learners. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020; 69(2): 843-860. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09893-z

3. Vireak K, & Bunrosy L. Exploring Language Teaching Methods: An in-Depth Analysis of Grammar Translation, Direct Method, and Audiolingual Method: A Literature Review. MultiTech Publisher; 2024.

4. Naro A, Maggio MG, Latella D, et al. Does embodied cognition allow a better management of neurological diseases? A review on the link between cognitive language processing and motor function. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. 2021; 29(6): 1646-1657. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1890595

5. Farina M. Embodied cognition: dimensions, domains and applications. Adaptive Behavior. 2020; 29(1): 73-88. doi: 10.1177/1059712320912963

6. Geneau D. Interactive learning laboratories of complex models in undergraduate biomechanics [PhD thesis]. University of Victoria; 2021.

7. Diekfuss JA, Bonnette S, Hogg JA, et al. Practical Training Strategies to Apply Neuro-Mechanistic Motor Learning Principles to Facilitate Adaptations Towards Injury-Resistant Movement in Youth. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise. 2020; 3(1): 3-16. doi: 10.1007/s42978-020-00083-0

8. Ruiz-Ruiz AJ. Application of Selected Principles from Kinesiology, Physical Development, and Psychomotor Learning to Cello Pedagogy [PhD thesis]. University of Miami; 2024.

9. Giorgi I, Golosio B, Esposito M, et al. Modeling Multiple Language Learning in a Developmental Cognitive Architecture. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems. 2021; 13(4): 922-933. doi: 10.1109/tcds.2020.3033963

10. Klimova B, Pikhart M. Current Research on the Impact of Foreign Language Learning Among Healthy Seniors on Their Cognitive Functions from a Positive Psychology Perspective—A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00765

11. Kampis D, Southgate V. Altercentric Cognition: How Others Influence Our Cognitive Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2020; 24(11): 945-959. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.003

12. Awad S, Debatin T, Ziegler A. Embodiment: I sat, I felt, I performed—Posture effects on mood and cognitive performance. Acta Psychologica. 2021; 218: 103353. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103353

13. Muller SJ. The Effects of Posture on Health Information Recall: A Randomised Trial [PhD thesis]. The University of Auckland; 2022.

14. Kim J, Kang SH, Li J, et al. Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exosuit on Postural Control and Cognitive Performance During a Fatigue-Inducing Posture Maintenance Task. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2024; 66(11): 2451-2467. doi: 10.1177/00187208231221890

15. Cervetto S, Díaz-Rivera M, Petroni A, et al. The neural blending of words and movement: event-related potential signatures of semantic and action processes during motor-language coupling. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2021; 33(8): 1413-1427. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01732

16. Borghi AM. A Future of Words: Language and the Challenge of Abstract Concepts. Journal of Cognition. 2020; 3(1). doi: 10.5334/joc.134

17. Macrine SL, Fugate JMB. Embodied Cognition and Its Educational Significance. Movement Matters. 2022; 13-24. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/13593.003.0006

18. Levin M. Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2022; 16. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201

19. Fei D. From ‘the mind isolated with the body’ to ‘the mind being embodied’: Contemporary approaches to the philosophy of the body. Cultures of Science. 2020; 3(3): 206-219. doi: 10.1177/2096608320960242

20. Jusslin S, Korpinen K, Lilja N, et al. Embodied learning and teaching approaches in language education: A mixed studies review. Educational Research Review. 2022; 37: 100480. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100480

21. Marouf I, Bourouina L, & Fanit I. Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Using Gestures in Teaching New Vocabulary to Young English Foreign Language Learners. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language). 2023; 8(2): 119-135.

22. Schöllhorn WI, Rizzi N, Slapšinskaitė-Dackevičienė A, et al. Always Pay Attention to Which Model of Motor Learning You Are Using. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(2): 711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020711

Published
2024-11-06
How to Cite
Wang, S. (2024). The role of biomechanics in enhancing cognitive function and learning outcomes in English language teaching. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 383. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i2.383
Section
Article