Intelligent rehabilitation assistant: Application of deep learning methods in sports injury recovery

  • Lu Guan Department of Physical Education, Inner Mongolia Business & Trade Vocational College, Hohhot 010070, China; Graduate University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 14200-0028, China
Keywords: intelligent rehabilitation assistant (IRA); sports injury recovery; redefined prairie dog optimized bidirectional long short-term memory (RPDO-BiLSTM)
Article ID: 384

Abstract

In recent years, sports injury rehabilitation has developed into a specialized field that has forced the combination of an orthopedic surgeon, sports physiotherapist, and sports physician. Determining the appropriate time for an injured athlete to resume practice or competition is regarded as sports rehabilitation. Discovering the best solutions to avoid injuries, maximize recovery, and enhance performance is crucial for sports activities. The study introduced an intelligent rehabilitation assistant (IRA) that leverages advanced deep learning (DL) methods to enhance sports injury recovery. In this study, the IRA incorporates redefined prairie dog optimized bidirectional long-short-term memory (RPDO-Bi-LSTM) to enhance accuracy, predicting sports injury recovery. The study collected data on the state of rehabilitation, physiological parameters, and general health using wearable sensors and movement patterns. The data was preprocessed using a median filter to remove noise from sensor data. Region-based segmentation using segmented images from preprocessed data. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) using extracted features from obtained data. The IRA provides personalized recovery plans and real-time feedback. The framework consists of the components, suggested models to create quality scores for motions, measurements to quantify motion performance, and scoring of performance measurement elements into numerical quality scores. The proposed method is implemented using Python software. RPDO-Bi-LSTM presentation is evaluated by various metrics, such as accuracy 94.2% recall 98.2%, precision 96.5%, and specificity 95.2%, f1 score 95.6%, he planned technique attained good performance and improved the accuracy of sports injury recovery.

References

1. Fonseca ST, Souza TR, Verhagen E, et al. Sports Injury Forecasting and Complexity: A Synergetic Approach. Sports Medicine. 2020; 50(10): 1757-1770. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01326-4

2. Tee JC, McLaren SJ, Jones B. Sports Injury Prevention is Complex: We Need to Invest in Better Processes, Not Singular Solutions. Sports Medicine. 2019; 50(4): 689-702. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01232-4

3. Bahr R, Clarsen B, et al. International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement: Methods for Recording and Reporting of Epidemiological Data on Injury and Illness in Sports 2020 (Including the STROBE Extension for Sports Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)). Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020; 8(2): 232596712090290. doi: 10.1177/2325967120902908

4. Edouard P, Caumeil B, Verhagen E, et al. Maximising individualisation of sports injury risk reduction approach to reach success. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2022; 26(3): 100394. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100394

5. Song H. Montenegro-Marin CE. Secure prediction and assessment of sports injuries using deep learning based convolutional neural network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2021; 12(3): 3399-3410. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100394

6. Chang WD, Chou LW, Chang NJ, et al. Comparison of Functional Movement Screen, Star Excursion Balance Test, and Physical Fitness in Junior Athletes with Different Sports Injury Risk. BioMed Research International. 2020; 2020: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2020/8690540

7. Zadeh A, Taylor D, Bertsos M, et al. Predicting sports injuries with wearable technology and data analysis. Information Systems Frontiers. 2021; 23: 1023-1037. doi: 10.1155/2020/8690540

8. Jederström M, Agnafors S, Ekegren C, et al. Determinants of Sports Injury in Young Female Swedish Competitive Figure Skaters. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2021; 3. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.686019

9. Orchard JW, Meeuwisse W, Derman W, et al. Sport Medicine Diagnostic Coding System (SMDCS) and the Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS): revised 2020 consensus versions. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020; 54(7): 397-401. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101921

10. Isern-Kebschull J, Mechó S, Pedret C, et al. Muscle Healing in Sports Injuries: MRI Findings and Proposed Classification Based on a Single Institutional Experience and Clinical Observation. RadioGraphics. 2024; 44(8). doi: 10.1148/rg.230147

11. Evans L, Brewer BW. Applied psychology of sport injury: Getting to—and moving across—The Valley of death. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2021; 34(5): 1011-1028. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2021.2015480

12. Yang J, Xia H, Wang Y, et al. RETRACTED: Simulation of badminton sports injury prediction based on the internet of things and wireless sensors. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2021; 81: 103676. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103676

13. Rommers N, Rössler R, Verhagen E, et al. A machine learning approach to assess injury risk in elite youth football players. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2020; 52(8): 1745-1751.

14. Ramkumar PN, Luu BC, Haeberle HS, et al. Sports Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: A Primer. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021; 50(4): 1166-1174. doi: 10.1177/03635465211008648

15. Namiri NK, Flament I, Astuto B, et al. Deep Learning for Hierarchical Severity Staging of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries from MRI. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2020; 2(4): e190207. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190207

16. Gautam A, Panwar M, Biswas D, et al. MyoNet: A transfer-learning-based LRCN for lower limb movement recognition and knee joint angle prediction for remote monitoring of rehabilitation progress from sEMG. IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine. 2020; 8: 1-10. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2020.2972523

17. Wu X, Liu C, Wang L, et al. Internet of things-enabled real-time health monitoring system using deep learning. Neural Computing and Applications. 2021; 35(20): 14565-14576. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06440-6

18. Rapp E, Shin S, Thomsen W, et al. Estimation of kinematics from inertial measurement units using a combined deep learning and optimization framework. Journal of Biomechanics. 2021; 116: 110229. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110229

19. Nwachukwu BU, Beck EC, Lee EK, et al. Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019; 48(2): 415-423. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892905

20. Yu Y, Xie Y, Thamm T, et al. Use of deep learning to predict final ischemic stroke lesions from initial magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA network open. 2020; 3(3): e200772-e200772. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.09.009

21. Richter C, O’Reilly M, Delahunt E. Machine learning in sports science: challenges and opportunities. Sports Biomechanics. 2024; 23(8): 961-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.021

22. Khalid S, Goldenberg M, Grantcharov T, et al. Evaluation of deep learning models for identifying surgical actions and measuring performance. JAMA network open. 2020; 3(3): e201664-e201664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206024

23. Di Paolo S, Lopomo NF, Della Villa F, et al. Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Assessment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Quantifying Joint Kinematics during Complex High-Speed Tasks through Wearable Sensors. Sensors. 2021; 21(7): 2331. doi: 10.3390/s21072331

24. Desai V. The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Sports Medicine and Return to Play. In: Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2024.

25. Wille CM, Hurley SA, Joachim MR, et al. Association of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging measures with time to return to sport and reinjury incidence following acute hamstring strain injury. Journal of Biomechanics. 2024; 163: 111960. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111960

26. Shiguang W. Retracted Article: Simulation of sports injury prevention and rehabilitation monitoring based on fiber optic sensors and machine learning algorithms. Optical and Quantum Electronics. 2024; 56(4). doi: 10.1007/s11082-024-06321-x

27. Cui J, Du H, Wu X. Data analysis of physical recovery and injury prevention in sports teaching based on wearable devices. Preventive Medicine. 2023; 173: 107589. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107589

Published
2024-11-06
How to Cite
Guan, L. (2024). Intelligent rehabilitation assistant: Application of deep learning methods in sports injury recovery. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 384. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i2.384
Section
Article