Effects of weaning stress and Bacillus licheniformis intervention on rumen and intestinal microflora of Hu lambs

  • Shengdong Li Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia; College of Life Science, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng 137000, China
  • Zanariah Hashim Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia
Keywords: early weaning; lambs; Bacillus licheniformis; microorganisms
Article ID: 439

Abstract

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effect of early weaning on the diversity of rumen and intestinal microbiota in Hu lambs, and the role of adding Bacillus licheniformis to the ration in regulating weaning stress in lambs. Ninety newborn Hu lambs with natural delivery and birth weight close to (3.82 ± 0.46 kg) were selected for the experiment, and were randomly divided into three treatment groups: normal weaning group (CON group, 49 d weaning), early weaning group (EW group, 21 d weaning), and B. licheniformis group (BL group, fed with 60 mg/kg BW B. licheniformis, viable count ≥ 2 × 109 cfu/g, weaned at 21 d), were slaughtered at 26, 35, and 63 d, rumen contents, rumen fluid samples, and jejunal segments were collected for subsequent experiments. The results showed that weaning stress reduced the abundance and diversity of flora in the rumen and jejunal contents and mucosa of lambs in the short term, but allowed the flora to enter a steady state earlier without affecting the final flora abundance and diversity, early feeding of B. licheniformis helped to restore the abundance of some genera in the rumen and jejunum of lambs.

References

1. Zhang Q., Li C., Niu X. (2019). The effects of milk replacer allowance and weaning age on the performance, nutrients digestibility, and ruminal microbiota communities of lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 257:114263, doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114263.

2. Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G. (2014). Expert consensus document. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11(8): 506-514.

3. Markowiak P., Slizewska K. (2017). Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients, 9(9): nu9091021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021.

4. Mccann J C., Elolimy A A., Loor J J. (2017). Rumen microbiome, probiotics, and fermentation additives. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 33(3): 539-553, doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2017.06.009

5. Gresse R., Chaucheyras-Durand F., Fleury M A. (2017). Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: understanding the keys to health. Trends in Microbiology, 25(10): 851-873, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004.

6. Hong H A., Duc Le H., Cutting S M. (2005). The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 29(4): 813-835.

7. Kim Y., Cho J Y., Kuk J H. (2004). Identification and antimicrobial activity of phenylacetic acid produced by Bacillus licheniformis isolated from fermented soybean, Chungkook-Jang.Current Microbiology, 48(4): 312-317, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-003-4193-3.

8. Xu S., Lin Y., Zeng D. (2018). Bacillus licheniformis normalize the ileum microbiota of chickens infected with necrotic enteritis. Scientific reports, 8(1): 1744, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20059-z.

9. Yanez-Ruiz D R., Abecia L., Newbold C J. (2015). Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6:1133, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133. eCollection 2015.

10. Picard C., Fioramonti J., Francois A. (2005). Review article: Bifidobacteria as probiotic agents -- physiological effects and clinical benefits. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 22(6): 495-512, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02615.x.

11. Yu X., Cui Z., Qin S. (2022). Effects of Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, diarrhea incidence, antioxidant capacity, immune function, and fecal microflora in weaned piglets. Animals, 12(13): 1609, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131609.

12. Tarradas J., Tous N., Esteve-Garcia E. (2020). The control of int estinal inflammation: A major objective in the research of probiotic strains as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry. Microorganisms, 8(2): 148, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2012.04.010.

13. Zhang R., Zhang W B., Bi Y L. (2019). Sanguinarine and resveratrol affected rumen fermentation parameters and bacterial community in calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 251:64-75, doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.03.004.

14. Broderick G., Kang J. (1980). Automated stimultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 63:64-75, doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8.

15. Fomenky B E., Chiquette J., Bissonnette N. (2017). Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii CNCMI-1079 and Lactobacillus acidophilus BT1386 on total lactobacilli population in the gastrointestinal tract and colon histomorphology of Holstein dairy calves.Animal Feed Science and Technology,234:151-161, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.08.019.

16. Edgar R C. (2013). UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads Nature Methods, 10(10): 996-998.

17. Schloss P D., Gevers D., Westcott S L. (2011). Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One, 6(12): e27310, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027310.

18. Khan M A., Bach A., Weary D M. (2016). Invited review: Transitioning from milk to solid feed in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(2): 885-902, doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9975.

19. Liu J., Bian G., Sun D. (2017a). Starter feeding supplementation alters colonic mucosal bacterial communities and modulates mucosal immune homeostasis in newborn lambs. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8:429, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00429.

20. Yang B., He B., Wang S S. (2015). Early supplementation of starter pellets with alfalfa improves the performance of pre- and postweaning Hu lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 93(10): 4984-4994, doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9266.

21. Yang B., Le J., Wu P. (2018). Alfalfa intervention alters rumen microbial community development in Hu lambs during early life. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9:574, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00574.

22. Rey M., Enjalbert F., Combes S. (2014). Establishment of ruminal bacterial community in dairy calves from birth to weaning is sequential. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 116(2): 245-25, doi: 10.1111/jam.12405.

23. Gensollen T., Iyer S S., Kasper D. (2016). How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science, 352(6285): 539-544, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9378.

24. Wang J., Tian S., Yu H. (2019). Response of colonic mucosa-associated microbiota composition, mucosal immune homeostasis, and barrier function to early life galactoo ligosaccharides intervention in suckling piglets. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 67(2): 578-588, doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05679.

25. Abecia L., Martinez-Fernandez G., Waddams K. (2018). Analysis of the rumen microbiome and metabolome to study the effect of an antimethanogenic treatment applied in early life of kid goats.Frontiers in Microbiology, 9:2227, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02227.

26. Chai J M., Ma T., Wang H C. (2017). Effect of early weaning age on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and serum parameters of lambs. Animal Production Science, 57(1):110-115, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.007.

Published
2024-11-07
How to Cite
Li, S., & Hashim, Z. (2024). Effects of weaning stress and Bacillus licheniformis intervention on rumen and intestinal microflora of Hu lambs. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 439. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb439
Section
Article