Enhancing college students physical education using artificial intelligence-optimized teaching system based on biomechanics
Abstract
Physical Education Teaching concerns the process of leading students to perform different tasks, games, and workouts that improve physical fitness, body control, and health. In the realm of cell and molecular biomechanics, physical education teaching can be regarded as a means to induce specific physiological responses at the microscopic level. The various physical activities in which students partake, like diverse tasks and workouts, exert mechanical forces that permeate throughout the body and impinge upon cells and tissues. During physical exertion, cells within muscles, bones, and connective tissues are subject to biomechanical stress. This stress triggers a cascade of molecular events. Teachers focus on enhancing spatial and manual skills, promoting cooperation, and setting up priorities. In this research, it is proposed to learn about the teaching system of physical education in colleges and universities using artificial intelligence (AI) optimization algorithm. Thus, for predicting the achievements of college students in physical education, we propose the Blue Monkey optimization-driven Weight-Tuned AdaBoost (BM-WTAdaBoost) algorithm. The observations and variables were derived from typical physical education programs of college students during their training sessions. A data pre-processing technique known as min–max normalization is applied to the obtained raw data to enhance its quality. For nonlinear data, Kernel Principal Component Analysis (kernel-PCA) is employed as it helps in extracting the nonlinear information, which in turn helps in making accurate predictions. The following is our proposed model: BM opt with WTAdaBoost to improve selecting features and model accuracy in predicting college students’ physical education outcomes. Python program uses our suggested technique. The finding assessment phase assesses the suggested model’s prediction efficacy using several measures, including the accuracy ratio (99.8%), F1-score (95.56%), prediction ratio (98.24%), interaction ratio (97.2%), efficiency ratio (98.24%), performance ratio (97.2%), and error rate (5.62%). We also performed a comparative analysis with different traditional approaches to assess the efficacy of the suggested strategy. Comparative analysis with traditional methods shows the superiority of this approach in predicting physical education outcomes considering cell and molecular biomechanics, providing a novel perspective for understanding and optimizing physical education in relation to the microscopic biological world.
References
1. Li J. Application of mobile information system based on internet in college physical education classroom teaching. Mobile Information Systems 2021; 1-10.
2. Shi Q. Construction of physical education teaching system in colleges and universities based on the concept of lifelong physical education. Journal of Education and Educational Research;2(2):75-78.
3. Li H, Zhang H, Zhao Y. Design of computer-aided teaching network management system for college physical education. Computer-Aided Design and Applications2021; 18:152-162.
4. Ding Y, Li Y, Cheng L. Application of Internet of Things and virtual reality technology in college physical education. IEEE Access 2020; 8:96065-96074.
5. Xing Z, Qi Y. Development of creativity in physical education teachers using interactive technologies: involvement and collaboration. Education and information technologies 2023; 28(5): 5763-5777.
6. Peng C, Zhou X, Liu S. An introduction to artificial intelligence and machine learning for online education. Mobile Networks and Applications 2022;27(3):1147-1150.
7. Zhang X, Ma C. Intelligent Development of College Physical Education Teaching Mode Based on “Internet+”. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT) 2024;19(1): 1-13.
8. Chen R, Wang T, Kim S. Optimizing teaching management in college physical education: A fuzzy neural network approach. Soft Computing 2023; 27(24):19299-19315.
9. Blavt O, Iedynak G, Pereverzieva S, Holub V, Melnyk S. Increasing the Reliability of Test Control Using Information Technologies in Inclusive Physical Education. Physical Education Theory and Methodology 2023; 23(4): 607-613.
10. Zhang X, Wang Y, Leung SO. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and sports bracelets usage in physical education for freshmen: the role of gender and self-efficacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 2023; 32(1): 45-63.
11. Baena-Morales S, Merma-Molina G, Ferriz-Valero A. Integrating education for sustainable development in physical education: fostering critical and systemic thinking. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2023; 24(8): 1915-1931.
12. Kaggle. BRFSS Physical Activity 2015-2021. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/asasherwyn/brfss-physical-activity-2015-2021 (accessed on 2 June 2024).
13. Li Q, Kumar P. and Alazab M. IoT-assisted physical education training network virtualization and resource management using a deep reinforcement learning system. Complex & Intelligent Systems 2022; 1-14.
14. Guan, J., & Tena, J. D. (2022). Physical activity, leisure-time, cognition and academic grades: Connections and causal effects in Chinese students. Journal of Asian Economics, 78, 101423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101423
15. Shuai Wang, S.W. (2022). Application of Internet of Things Framework in Physical Education System.
16. Wu, D., Guo, Z., Wang, Y. Et al. Auxiliary analysis of digital platform using internet of things technology in physical education teaching. Educ Inf Technol 29, 15855–15874 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12469-6
17. Wyant, J. D., Keath, A., Towner, B., Wayda, V., & Baek, J. H. (2024). Navigating the T.E.C.H.N.O.L.G.Y. Integration Landscape in Physical Education: Principles, Tools, and Solutions for Sustained Use. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 95(9), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2024.2396306
18. Li, X., Tan, W.H., Zheng, X. et al. Effects of digital monitoring and immediate feedback on physical activity and fitness in undergraduates. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12990-8
19. Arvidsson, T. S., & Kuhn, D. (2021). Realizing the full potential of individualizing learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101960
20. Redondo-Flórez L, Ramos-Campo DJ, Clemente-Suárez VJ. Relationship between Physical Fitness and Academic Performance in University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):14750. Published 2022 Nov 10. doi:10.3390/ijerph192214750
21. Liu, M., Shi, B. & Gao, X. The way to relieve college students’ academic stress: the influence mechanism of sports interest and sports atmosphere. BMC Psychol 12, 327 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01819-1
Copyright (c) 2025 Zixuan Gao, Hongjing Guan, Zhi Tan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.