Biomechanical differences in maximum snatch weight between elite and sub-elite weightlifters: A one-dimensional statistical parameter mapping study

  • Zhanyang He College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321000, China
Keywords: snatch technique; statistical parametric mapping; weightlifting; kinematics; biomechanics
Article ID: 525

Abstract

Background: Current research primarily relies on discrete data collected at specific time points to analyze the weightlifting process, often overlooking the impact of continuous temporal changes on athletic performance. Purpose: This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the one-dimensional kinematic patterns of maximum snatch weight actions in elite and sub-elite weightlifters using statistical parameter mapping (SPM). It explores kinematic differences in snatch actions between elite and sub-elite weightlifters, which assists in summarizing the technical characteristics of elite athletes. Methods: Two cameras recorded three successful maximum snatch attempts of 10 elite and 10 sub-elite weightlifters at the World Weightlifting Championships and Chinese Olympic selection competitions. Simi Motion 10.2 was used for kinematic analysis. SPM was employed for comparative analysis of snatch kinematics among different levels of weightlifters, and independent sample t-tests were used for phase duration proportions. Results: Elite weightlifters showed significant advantages in multiple movement phases: smaller knee joint angles in M1 phase (p < 0.001, 35.82%–78.45%) and M3 phases (p = 0.047, 17.47%–24.74%; p = 0.036, 30.92%–49.38%; p = 0.040, 50.93%–65.85%); lower vertical body center of gravity (COG) height in M1 phase (p = 0.019, 0.00%–51.08%), M3 phase (p = 0.046, 48.27%–100.00%), and M5 phase (p = 0.045, 38.49%–59.54%); closer displacement between barbell COG and body COG in M1 phase (p = 0.006, 0%–38.18%; p = 0.048, 43.91%–48.94%) and M2 phase (p = 0.026, 0%–100%); greater barbell acceleration in M5 phase (p < 0.001, 0%–94.61%); and slower barbell descent speed in M6 phase (p = 0.001, 0%–30.58%; p = 0.046, 44.57%–51.37%; p = 0.048, 67.16%–72.41%). Moreover, elite weightlifters exhibited significantly higher phase duration proportions in M1 phase (p = 0.034, d = 1.03) than sub-elite weightlifters. Conclusion: Elite weightlifters demonstrated longer distance and time exerting work on the barbell in M1 phase, less energy consumption in barbell ascent in M2 phase, and greater upward power gain for the barbell in M1 and M3 phases. They showed faster squat-to-barbell catching speed in M4 phase and excellent braking and precise squat-to-barbell catching capabilities in M5 and M6 phases.

References

1. Nagao H, Huang Z, Kubo Y. Biomechanical comparison of successful snatch and unsuccessful frontward barbell drop in world-class male weightlifters. Sport Biomech. 2020 2020. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1787498 doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1787498

2. Bartonietz KE. Biomechanics of the snatch: toward a higher training efficiency. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 1996 1996;18(3):24-31.

3. Burdett RG. Biomechanics of the snatch technique of highly skilled and skilled weightlifters. Res Q Exercise Sport. 1982 1982;53(3):193-97.

4. Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Garas A, Mavromatis G. Unsuccessful vs. Successful performance in snatch lifts: a kinematic approach. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2009 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318196b843 doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318196b843

5. Harbili E, Alptekin A. Comparative kinematic analysis of the snatch lifts in elite male adolescent weightlifters. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2014 2014.

6. Barabas A, Fabian GY, editors. Complex investigation of successful weightlifting exercises; 1987; 1987.

7. Garhammer J. Biomechanical profiles of olympic weightlifters. J Appl Biomech. 1985 1985;1(2):122-30.

8. Baumann W, Gross V, Quade K, Galbierz P, Schwirtz A. The snatch technique of world class weightlifters at the 1985 world championships. J Appl Biomech. 1988 1988;4(1):68-89.

9. Gourgoulis V, Aggelousis N, Mavromatis G, Garas A. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the snatch of elite greek weightlifters. J Sport Sci. 2000 2000;18(8):643-52.

10. Lei W, Shiyong Y, Wei AK. Kinematics analysis of olympic champion shi zhiyong's snatch technique. Journal of Shandong Institute of Physical Education. 2011;27(12):63-69. doi: 10.14104/j.cnki.1006-2076.2011.12.015

11. GOURGOULIS V, AGGELOUSSIS N, ANTONIOU P, CHRISTOFORIDIS C, MAVROMATIS G, GARAS A. Comparative 3-dimensional kinematic analysis of the snatch technique in elite male and female greek weightlifters. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2002 2002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2002)016<0359:cdkaot>2.0.co;2 doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2002)016<0359:cdkaot>2.0.co;2

12. Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kalivas V, Antoniou P, Mavromatis G. Snatch lift kinematics and bar energetics in male adolescent and adult weightlifters. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2004 2004;44(2):126-31.

13. G L, G F, H Y, J M, D S, Q M, et al. Comparative 3-dimensional kinematic analysis of snatch technique between top-elite and sub-elite male weightlifters in 69-kg category. Heliyon. 2018;4(7):e658. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00658

14. AkkuŞ H. Kinematic analysis of the snatch lift with elite female weightlifters during the 2010 world weightlifting championship. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2012 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e31822e5945 doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31822e5945

15. Ikeda Y, Jinji T, Matsubayashi T, Matsuo A, Inagaki E, Takemata T, et al. Comparison of the snatch technique for female weightlifters at the 2008 asian championships. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2012 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318225bca1 doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318225bca1

16. Pataky TC. Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping. J Biomech. 2010 2010. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.008

17. Xu D, Lu J, Baker JS, Fekete G, Gu Y. Temporal kinematic and kinetics differences throughout different landing ways following volleyball spike shots. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2021. doi: 10.1177/17543371211009485

18. Xu D, Zhou H, Quan W, Gusztav F, Wang M, Baker JS, et al. Accurately and effectively predict the acl force: utilizing biomechanical landing pattern before and after-fatigue. Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2023 2023;241:107761. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260723004273 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107761

19. Zhou H, Xu D, Quan W, Ugbolue U, Sculthorpe N, Baker J, et al. A foot joint and muscle force assessment of the running stance phase whilst wearing normal shoes and bionic shoes. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics / Wroclaw University of Technology. 2022 2022-10-26;24:2022. doi: 10.37190/ABB-02022-2022-03

20. E H. A gender-based kinematic and kinetic analysis of the snatch lift in elite weightlifters in 69-kg category. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2012;11(1):162-69.

21. Liu G, He Z, Ye B, Guo H, Pan H, Zhu H, et al. Comparative analysis of the kinematic characteristics of lunge-style and squat-style jerk techniques in elite weightlifters. Life; 2024; [cited 2024]. doi: 10.3390/life14091086

22. Latzka EW, Booker L, Harrast MA. Sports biomechanics. Sports Medicine; 2021. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826182395.0004 doi: 10.1891/9780826182395.0004

23. Chiu H, Wang C, Cheng KB. The three-dimensional kinematics of a barbell during the snatch of taiwanese weightlifters. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010 2010;24(6):1520-26.

24. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016 2016. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

25. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology a power primer. 1992 1992-01.

26. Isaka T, Okada J, Funato K. Kinematic analysis of the barbell during the snatch movement of elite asian weight lifters. J Appl Biomech. 1996 1996;12(4):508-16.

27. Garhammer J, Taylor L, editors. Center of pressure movements during weightlifting; 1984; 1984.

28. Enoka RM. Load- and skill-related changes in segmental contributions to a weightlifting movement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1988 1988. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198820020-00013 doi: 10.1249/00005768-198820020-00013

29. Enoka RM. Muscular control of a learned movement: the speed control system hypothesis. Exp Brain Res. 1983 1983. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00236811 doi: 10.1007/bf00236811

30. Hwang S, Kim Y, Kim Y. Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting. Bmc Musculoskel Dis. 2009 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-15 doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-15

31. Ilyin A, Livanov D, Falameev A. Duration of the nonsupport phase in the snatch and clean. M. Yessis (Ed.). 1979 1979:180-81.

32. Kipp K, Cunanan AJ, Warmenhoven J. Bivariate functional principal component analysis of barbell trajectories during the snatch. Sport Biomech. 2020 2020. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1820074 doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1820074

33. Ryan W, Harrison A, Hayes K. Functional data analysis of knee joint kinematics in the vertical jump. Sport Biomech. 2006 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2006.9628228 doi: 10.1080/14763141.2006.9628228

34. Stone MH, O'Bryant HS, Williams FE, Johnson RL, Pierce KC. Analysis of bar paths during the snatch in elite male weightlifters. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 1998 1998;20(4):30-38.

Published
2024-11-06
How to Cite
He, Z. (2024). Biomechanical differences in maximum snatch weight between elite and sub-elite weightlifters: A one-dimensional statistical parameter mapping study. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 525. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i2.525
Section
Article