The impact of biomechanical factors on tourist satisfaction and comfort in walking tourism: A study of Beijing’s walking tours

  • Huiqi Zhang School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100091, China
  • Ting Liu School of Marxism, Guangdong Polytechnic of Science and Technology, Zhuhai 519000, China
Keywords: fatigue; energy expenditure; tourist satisfaction; comfort; walking tourism; Beijing
Article ID: 553

Abstract

Walking tourism combines physical activity with cultural and environmental exploration, making it a growing sector of the tourism industry. This study investigates the effects of key biomechanical factors—fatigue and energy expenditure—on tourist experiences, specifically focusing on satisfaction and comfort during walking tours in Beijing. Using a structured questionnaire administered to 175 participants across various walking tour sites—including the Great Wall, Hutongs, and the Summer Palace—we collected data on perceived fatigue, energy expenditure, satisfaction, and comfort. Statistical analyses, including regression models and correlation tests conducted using SPSS, revealed that increased fatigue significantly reduces tourist satisfaction, while higher energy expenditure decreases comfort levels. These findings highlight the importance of managing physical demands in walking tours by incorporating rest periods and considering tourists’ fitness levels. The study contributes to the literature by linking biomechanical factors to tourist experiences and offers practical recommendations for tour operators to enhance the appeal and competitiveness of walking tours, ultimately leading to improved tourist satisfaction.

References

1. Gonçalves AR, Caetano M. Walkability and its influence on the health and well-being of tourists. Leisure Stud. 2023,42(2):220-235. doi:10.1080/02614367.2023.2298951.

2. Bujdosó Z, Dávid L, Tóth G. The role of walking tourism in developing rural areas. J Phys Educ Sport. 2020,20(1):50-59. Available from: https://www.efsupit.ro/images/stories/art%207.%20manuscipt_JPES_Bujdoso_David_rev.pdf.

3. Danka S. Examining the relationship between walking tourism and sustainable destination development. Rev Socio-Econ Perspect. 2023,8(2):45-62. Available from: https://reviewsep.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/1_DANKA-1.pdf.

4. Jensen JS, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Sørensen AS, Aagaard P, Bojsen-Møller J. Acute effects of robot-assisted body weight unloading on biomechanical movement patterns during overground walking. J Biomech. 2023,111862:111862-74. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111862

5. Jin S, Guo S, Kazunobu H, Xiong X, Yamamoto M. Influence of a soft robotic suit on metabolic cost in long-distance level and inclined walking. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018,2018:9573951-9. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9573951

6. Bertomeu-Motos A. Biomechanics of human walking and stability descriptive parameters. Doctum Health. 2016,1(1):880-93. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21134/DOCTUMH.V1I1.880

7. Prebble M, Sikdar S, Eddo O, McCrory S, Caswell S, Azevedo AM, Cortes N. Biomechanics of Walking in Healthy Adults at Different Gait Speeds: 121 Board #2 May 30 9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018,50(5S):121-9. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000535118.61829.e2

8. Kamal SM, Sim S, Tee R, Nathan V, Namazi H. Complexity-based analysis of the relation between human muscle reaction and walking path. Int J Dyn Complex Syst. 2020,21(2):25-30. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s021947752050025x

9. van der Zee TJ, Mundinger EM, Kuo A. A biomechanics dataset of healthy human walking at various speeds, step lengths and step widths. Sci Data. 2022,9:121-31. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01817-1

10. Song Z, Zhang S. Pedestrian induced structural vibration and the walking force models basing on biomechanics: a literature review. Proc Adv Des Mech Eng. 2015,2015:1522-31. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ICADME-15.2015.304

11. Struble M, Gibb A. Do we all walk the walk? A comparison of walking behaviors across tetrapods. Integr Comp Biol. 2022,62(5):1246-61. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/icac125

12. Stojicevic M, Stoimenov M, Jeli ZV. A bipedal mechanical walker with balancing mechanism. Tech Gaz. 2018,25(1):285-93. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.17559/TV-20160111160338

13. Song Z, Zhang S. Pedestrian induced structural vibration and the walking force models basing on biomechanics: a literature review. Proc Adv Des Mech Eng. 2015,2015:1522-31. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ICADME-15.2015.304

14. Toso M, Gomes H, Silva FT, Pimentel R. Experimentally fitted biodynamic models for pedestrian–structure interaction in walking situations. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2016,70(1):256-74. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2015.10.029

15. Brough LG, Klute G, Neptune R. Biomechanical response to mediolateral foot-placement perturbations during walking. J Biomech. 2020,113:110213. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110213

16. Roberts A, Roscoe D, Hulse D, Bennett A, Dixon S. Biomechanical differences between cases with chronic exertional compartment syndrome and asymptomatic controls during walking and marching gait. Gait Posture. 2017,57:267-73. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.07.044

17. Zhang G, Chen TL, Wang Y, Tan Q, Hong TT, Peng Y, Chen S, Zhang M. Effects of prolonged brisk walking induced lower limb muscle fatigue on the changes of gait parameters in older adults. Gait Posture. 2023,101:230-8. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.02.010

18. Susilo T. Effect of backpack load on gait speed during walking among university students: a pilot study. Fisiomu. 2023,4(1):14-21. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.23917/fisiomu.v4i1.21401

19. Luo L, Fu Z, Zhou X, Zhu K, Yang H, Yang L. Fatigue effect on phase transition of pedestrian movement: experiment and simulation study. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. 2016,2016(10):103401. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/10/103401

20. Panizzolo F, Galiana I, Asbeck A, Siviy C, Schmidt K, Holt K, Walsh C. A biologically-inspired multi-joint soft exosuit that can reduce the energy cost of loaded walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016,13:43. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9

21. Siegel R, Crizer MP, Bland MC, Harris M. The fitness benefits of a walking pilgrimage: a pilot study on El Camino De Santiago. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015,47(5S):432-9. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000466132.75579.52

22. hseo, Park J. A study on satisfaction on walking tourism in Seoul: Applied on Expectation Disconfirmation Theory. J Tour Leis Res. 2019,31(3):61-74. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2019.3.31.3.61

23. Štumpf P, Janeček P, Vojtko V. Is visitor satisfaction high enough? A case of rural tourism destination, South Bohemia. Eur Countrys. 2022,14(2):258-77. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/euco-2022-0017

24. Ramesh V, Jaunky V. The tourist experience: Modelling the relationship between tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty. Mater Today Proc. 2020,33:6763-72. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.723

25. Kuo N, Chang KC, Cheng YS, Lin JC. Effects of tour guide interpretation and tourist satisfaction on destination loyalty in Taiwan’s Kinmen Battlefield Tourism: Perceived playfulness and perceived flow as moderators. J Travel Tour Mark. 2016,33(1):103-22. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1008670

26. Rabbiosi C, Meneghello S. Questioning walking tourism from a phenomenological perspective: epistemological and methodological innovations. Humanit (Basel). 2023,12(4):65. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/h12040065

27. Hall C, Ram Y. Measuring the relationship between tourism and walkability? Walk Score and English tourist attractions. J Sustain Tour. 2019,27(2):197-213. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1404607

28. Noraffendi BQB, Rahman N. Tourist expectation and satisfaction towards pedestrian walkway in Georgetown, a World Heritage Site. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020,447:012072. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012072

29. Tretyakova T, Savinovskaya A. Eco tourism as a recreational impact factor on human condition. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 2016,20(3):437-41.

30. Niezgoda A, Nowacki M. Experiencing nature: Physical activity, beauty and tension in Tatra National Park—Analysis of TripAdvisor reviews. Sustainability. 2020,12(2):601. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12020601

31. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). “An index of factorial simplicity.” Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

32. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). “Tests of significance in factor analysis.” British Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 77-85.

33. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). “Multivariate Data Analysis” (7th ed.). Pearson.

Published
2024-11-06
How to Cite
Zhang, H., & Liu, T. (2024). The impact of biomechanical factors on tourist satisfaction and comfort in walking tourism: A study of Beijing’s walking tours. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(2), 553. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb.v21i2.553
Section
Article