Understanding the biomechanics of music-induced emotions: A study of physical responses to rhythm and melody
Abstract
This study investigated the biomechanical aspects of music-induced emotions through a comprehensive analysis of physical responses to rhythm and melody among 28 participants in China. Using high-precision physiological monitoring equipment, this study measured Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Muscle Activation (MA), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), and Body Sway Patterns (BSP) in response to standardized musical stimuli. Results revealed distinct physiological response patterns between rhythmic and melodic elements. Rhythmic stimuli elicited more robust cardiovascular responses, with mean HRV increases of 15.4 ± 1.7 bpm during fast rhythms (132–144 BPM) compared to 5.2 ± 1.1 bpm for melodic features (p < 0.001, d = 1.24). Muscle tension significantly correlated with rhythmic elements (r = 0.81, p < 0.001) and demonstrated progressive adaptation, with response latencies decreasing from 285 ± 42 to 156 ± 28 ms over exposure time. Melodic features induced more varied responses, with ascending phrases increasing HRV by 4.8 ± 0.9 bpm while sustained notes decreased it by 3.6 ± 0.8 bpm. Analysis of self-reported emotions strongly correlated with physiological measures, particularly for high-intensity emotional states (concordance rate: 92.1 ± 3.2%, α = 0.91). The study revealed a hierarchical organization in rhythm processing, with MA showing the quickest response (178 ± 25 ms), followed by HRV (245 ± 35 ms) and GSR (475 ± 62 ms). These findings provide quantitative evidence for the differential impact of rhythmic and melodic elements on physiological responses, contributing to this work’s understanding of music-induced emotional processing and its potential applications in therapeutic contexts.
References
1. Singh, M., & Mehr, S. A. (2023). Universality, domain-specificity, and development of psychological responses to music. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(6), 333-346.
2. Persiani, S. G., Kobas, B., Koth, S. C., & Auer, T. (2021). Biometric data as real-time measure of physiological reactions to environmental stimuli in the built environment. Energies, 14(1), 232.
3. Patlar Akbulut, F. (2022). Hybrid deep convolutional model-based emotion recognition using multiple physiological signals. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 25(15), 1678-1690.
4. Finkenzeller, T., Burberg, T., Kranzinger, S., Harbour, E., Snyder, C., Würth, S., & Amesberger, G. (2022). Effects of physical stress in Alpine skiing on psychological, physiological, and biomechanical parameters: an individual approach. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 971137.
5. Thompson, W. F., Bullot, N. J., & Margulis, E. H. (2023). The psychological basis of music appreciation: Structure, self, source. Psychological Review, 130(1), 260.
6. Sengan Sudhakar and S. Chenthur Pandian, (2016), ‘Hybrid Cluster-based Geographical Routing Protocol to Mitigate Malicious Nodes in Mobile Ad Hoc Network, InderScience-International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 224-236. DOI:10.1504/IJAHUC.2016.076358.
7. Gilley, A. Electronic dance music (EDM) and contemporary dance performance: a somaesthetic investigation of core musical aesthetics and audience felt experience.
8. Czepiel, A., Fink, L. K., Fink, L. T., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., Tröndle, M., & Merrill, J. (2021). Synchrony in the periphery: inter-subject correlation of physiological responses during live music concerts. Scientific reports, 11(1), 22457.
9. Gustavson, D. E., Coleman, P. L., Iversen, J. R., Maes, H. H., Gordon, R. L., & Lense, M. D. (2021). Mental health and music engagement: review, framework, and guidelines for future studies. Translational psychiatry, 11(1), 370.
10. Daffern, H., Balmer, K., & Brereton, J. (2021). Singing together, yet apart: The experience of UK choir members and facilitators during the Covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 624474.
11. Pingle, Y. P., & Ragha, L. K. (2024). An in-depth analysis of music structure and its effects on human body for music therapy. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(15), 45715-45738.
12. Toader, C., Tataru, C. P., Florian, I. A., Covache-Busuioc, R. A., Bratu, B. G., Glavan, L. A., ... & Ciurea, A. V. (2023). Cognitive Crescendo: How Music Shapes the Brain’s Structure and Function. Brain sciences, 13(10), 1390.
13. Costalonga, L. Biomechanical modelling of guitar performance.
14. Hribernik, M., Umek, A., Tomažič, S., & Kos, A. (2022). Review of real-time biomechanical feedback systems in sport and rehabilitation. Sensors, 22(8), 3006.
15. Wright, S. E., Bégel, V., & Palmer, C. (2022). Physiological influences of music in perception and action. Cambridge University Press.
16. Fiveash, A., Bedoin, N., Gordon, R. L., & Tillmann, B. (2021). Processing rhythm in speech and music: Shared mechanisms and implications for developmental speech and language disorders. Neuropsychology, 35(8), 771.
17. Vuust, P., Heggli, O. A., Friston, K. J., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2022). Music in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23(5), 287-305.
18. Ding, K., Li, J., Li, X., & Li, H. (2024). Understanding the Effect of Listening to Music, Playing Music, and Singing on Brain Function: A Scoping Review of fNIRS Studies. Brain Sciences, 14(8), 751.
19. Reybrouck, M., Vuust, P., & Brattico, E. (2021). Neural correlates of music listening: Does the music matter? Brain Sciences, 11(12), 1553.
20. Clayton, M., Jakubowski, K., Eerola, T., Keller, P. E., Camurri, A., Volpe, G., & Alborno, P. (2020). Interpersonal entrainment in music performance: theory, method, and model. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 38(2), 136-194.
21. Fiorin, G., & Delfitto, D. (2024). Syncopation as structure bootstrapping: the role of asymmetry in rhythm and language. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1304485.
22. Indumathi N et al., Impact of Fireworks Industry Safety Measures and Prevention Management System on Human Error Mitigation Using a Machine Learning Approach, Sensors, 2023, 23 (9), 4365; DOI:10.3390/s23094365.
23. Parkavi K et al., Effective Scheduling of Multi-Load Automated Guided Vehicle in Spinning Mill: A Case Study, IEEE Access, 2023, DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236843.
24. Ran Q et al., English language teaching based on big data analytics in augmentative and alternative communication system, Springer-International Journal of Speech Technology, 2022, DOI:10.1007/s10772-022-09960-1.
25. Ngangbam PS et al., Investigation on characteristics of Monte Carlo model of single electron transistor using Orthodox Theory, Elsevier, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, Vol. 48, 2021, 101601, DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101601.
26. Huidan Huang et al., Emotional intelligence for board capital on technological innovation performance of high-tech enterprises, Elsevier, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2021, 101633, DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2021.101633.
27. Sudhakar S, et al., Cost-effective and efficient 3D human model creation and re-identification application for human digital twins, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021. DOI:10.1007/s11042-021-10842-y.
28. Prabhakaran N et al., Novel Collision Detection and Avoidance System for Mid-vehicle Using Offset-Based Curvilinear Motion. Wireless Personal Communication, 2021. DOI:10.1007/s11277-021-08333-2.
29. Balajee A et al., Modeling and multi-class classification of vibroarthographic signals via time domain curvilinear divergence random forest, J Ambient Intell Human Comput, 2021, DOI:10.1007/s12652-020-02869-0.
30. Omnia SN et al., An educational tool for enhanced mobile e-Learning for technical higher education using mobile devices for augmented reality, Microprocessors, and Microsystems, 83, 2021, 104030, DOI:10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104030.
31. Firas TA et al., Strategizing Low-Carbon Urban Planning through Environmental Impact Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Driven Carbon Foot Print Forecasting, Journal of Machine and Computing, 4(4), 2024, doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202404105.
32. Shaymaa HN, et al., Genetic Algorithms for Optimized Selection of Biodegradable Polymers in Sustainable Manufacturing Processes, Journal of Machine and Computing, 4(3), 563-574, https://doi.org/10.53759/7669/jmc202404054.
33. Hayder MAG et al., An open-source MP + CNN + BiLSTM model-based hybrid model for recognizing sign language on smartphones. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02376-x
34. Bhavana Raj K et al., Equipment Planning for an Automated Production Line Using a Cloud System, Innovations in Computer Science and Engineering. ICICSE 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 565, 707–717, Springer, Singapore. DOI:10.1007/978-981-19-7455-7_57.
Copyright (c) 2024 Wenjing Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
