Advancing an ecological framework for English language teaching in web-based environments

  • Fangyin Tong Changsha Medical College, Changsha 410219, China
Keywords: biomechanics; mechanotransduction; cellular interaction forces; data mining; computational biomechanics
Article ID: 709

Abstract

As English language teaching (ELT) adapts to the digital age, web-based environments present new challenges for achieving an ecologically balanced instructional ecosystem. Applying an educational ecology framework, this study examines the structural and functional dynamics within web-based ELT, viewing the digital classroom as a biomechanical system where information flow, interaction forces, and adaptation mechanisms play crucial roles. By integrating Data Mining (DM) technology, the study evaluates ELT efficiency from an ecological standpoint, aiming to enhance both student engagement and learning outcomes through optimized instructional dynamics. Findings indicate that the applied algorithm achieves an accuracy of 95.27%, with system stability maintained above 90% under high parallel processing loads, demonstrating the robust performance of this approach. Ultimately, this paper contributes to the development of an ecologically balanced, web-based ELT model, supporting educators in creating adaptable, resilient digital learning environments.

References

1. Chen H, Huang J. Research and Application of the Interactive English Online Teaching System Based on the Internet of Things[J]. Scientific Programming, 2021, 2021(1):1-10.

2. Sifakis NC. ELF Awareness in English language teaching: Principles and Processes[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2017, 2017(2):2.

3. Soureshjani KH. Book Review: Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners[J]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2014, 9(2):196-197.

4. Abdelhadi A, Nurunnabi M. Engineering Student Evaluation of Teaching Quality in Saudi Arabia[J]. The international journal of engineering education, 2019, 35(1):262-272.

5. Vettorel, Paola. Decolonizing Primary English language teaching[J]. ELT Journal, 2018, 72(2):217-219.

6. Lu C, He B, Zhang R. Evaluation of English interpretation teaching quality based on GA optimized RBF neural network[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40(2):3185-3192.

7. Bote-Lorenzo ML, Asensio-Perez JI, Gomez-Sanchez E, et al. A grid service‐based Distributed Network Simulation Environment for computer networks education[J]. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2012, 20(4):654–665.

8. Santos D. Nigel Harwood (ed.): English language teaching Textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2016, 37(1):128-132.

9. Al-Qallaf CL, Al-Mutairi A. Digital literacy and digital content supports learning: The impact of blogs on teaching English as a foreign language[J]. Electronic Library, 2016, 34(3):522-547.

10. Li D, Edwards V. English language teaching and educational reform in Western China: A knowledge management perspective[J]. System, 2014, 47(5):88-101.

11. Sheridan, Cheryl L. National Journals and Centering Institutions: A historiography of an English language teaching journal in Taiwan[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2015, 38(10):70-84.

12. Saito H, Ebsworth ME. Seeing English language teaching and Learning through the Eyes of Japanese EFL and ESL Students[J]. Foreign Language Annals, 2010, 37(1):111-124.

13. Martin IP. English language teaching in the Philippines[J]. World Englishes, 2014, 33(4):472-485.

14. Liu L. Research on IT English Flipped Classroom Teaching Model Based on SPOC[J]. Scientific Programming, 2021, 2021(5):1-9.

15. Deng B. Word order detection in English classroom teaching based on improved genetic algorithm of block coding[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 40(6):1-12.

16. Xerri, Daniel. Feature Films in English language teaching[J]. ELT Journal, 2019, 73(1):92-94.

17. Hayashi Y, Kobayashi T, Toyoshige T. Investigating the Relative Contributions of Computerised Working Memory Training and English language teaching to Cognitive and Foreign Language Development[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2016, 30(2):517-527.

18. Sun C, Wei L, Young R F. Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods:[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2022, 26(3):382-410.

19. Yuan T. Algorithm of Classroom Teaching Quality Evaluation Based on Markov Chain[J]. Complexity, 2021, 2021(21):1-12.

20. Sun Q. Evaluation model of classroom teaching quality based on improved RVM algorithm and knowledge recommendation[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40(2):2457-2467.

21. Alkateeb H A. The British Council’s role in nourishing the English language teaching industry in the Gulf Cooperation Council region: a visual social semiotic perspective[J]. Social Semiot21(3):1-21.

22. Ebadi S, Aliabadi R B, Ajabshir Z F. EFL teachers’ engagement-promoting strategies in online gamification: an ecological systems theory (EST) perspective[J]. Current Psychology, 2024: 1-16.

23. Dabbagh N. The Pedagogical Ecology of Learning Technologies: A Learning Design Framework for Meaningful Online Learning[M]//Higher Education in the Arab World: E-Learning and Distance Education. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023: 25-51.

24. Coss M. Navigating additional language pedagogical innovation: An ecological perspective on a novice teacher’s TBLT implementation in China[J]. 2023.

Published
2024-12-10
How to Cite
Tong, F. (2024). Advancing an ecological framework for English language teaching in web-based environments. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(4), 709. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb709
Section
Article