Effects of dynamic stretching of different duration on lower limb flexibility in male sport dancers: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
In the field of sports training and teaching, stretching is regarded as a highly valuable technique, particularly in its capacity to facilitate gradual acclimatization of the body to the exercise state during the warm-up session and as a means of enhancing flexibility qualities. As the research on athletic training continues to deepen, the discussion on the respective advantages of static stretching and dynamic stretching is becoming increasingly prominent. In this study, dynamic stretching was selected as the primary intervention to investigate the effects of varying durations of dynamic stretching on the flexibility of the legs of male students majoring in sport dance, with a particular focus on the underlying biomechanical mechanisms. Method: The subjects were 40 male first- and second-year students majoring in physical education dance at Yichun College, randomly assigned to one of four groups of 10 students each. The methodology comprised a dynamic stretching warm-up and quality training prior to the commencement of regular sports dance teaching, after which the basic teaching session was initiated. The study employed SPSS 22.0 software to conduct a T-test to analyze the effects of different stretching durations on flexibility. SPSS 22.0 software was utilized to perform a T-test. Biomechanical parameters such as muscle fiber recruitment patterns, joint range of motion, and force generation during stretching were also measured and analyzed. Results: (1) Dynamic stretching in warm-ups and training can boost lower limb flexibility. Biomechanically, this is attributed to the activation of specific muscle groups and the modulation of connective tissue properties. A significant difference observed between dominant and non-dominant limbs, which may be related to differences in neuromuscular control and muscle fiber composition. (2) A 20-minute stretch in warm-ups and a 30-minute stretch in training were best for flexibility, showing a more pronounced effect on the dominant side. This could be due to the dominant limb's greater ability to generate force and adapt to biomechanical stress, as well as its more efficient neuromuscular coordination. (3) The right side, which corresponds to the dominant limb in most subjects, improved more than the left with dynamic stretching. This could be attributed to the greater neural activation and muscle recruitment efficiency, which are key biomechanical factors in the stretching response. (4) Although dynamic stretching is slower than static stretching in enhancing flexibility, consistent sessions exceeding 20 minutes can still yield positive results for both limbs though the dominant limb may benefit more initially., likely due to its pre-existing biomechanical advantages and more refined neuromuscular pathways. Conclusion: Dynamic stretching effectively improves lower limb flexibility, though more slowly than static stretching. Regular sessions over 20 min, especially 20-minute warm-ups and 30-minute training, can notably enhance flexibility, with a significant impact on the dominant limb, suggesting that while non-dominant limbs also benefit, the dominant limb may require less time to achieve similar flexibility improvements due to its inherent biomechanical and neuromuscular characteristics.
References
1. Philpott, E.J., et al., The Effects of High-Intensity, Short-Duration and Low-Intensity, Long-Duration Hamstrings Static Stretching on Contralateral Limb Performance. Sports, 2024. 12(9): 257.
2. Faulkner, E., Choreography-specific cross-training and conditioning programs. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics, 2021. 32(1): 103-115.
3. Behm, D.G., et al., Potential effects of dynamic stretching on injury incidence of athletes: a narrative review of risk factors. Sports Medicine, 2023. 53(7): 1359-1373.
4. Biernacki, J.L., et al., Risk factors for lower-extremity injuries in female ballet dancers: a systematic review. Clinical journal of sport medicine, 2021. 31(2): e64-e79.
5. Yamaguchi, T., K. Takizawa, and K. Shibata, Acute effect of dynamic stretching on endurance running performance in well-trained male runners. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2015. 29(11): 3045-3052.
6. Takeuchi, K., et al., Effects of Speed and Amplitude of Dynamic Stretching on the Flexibility and Strength of the Hamstrings. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2022; 21(4): 608.
7. D'Elia, F., et al., Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects. Journal of Physical Education, 2022. 33: e3339.
8. Opplert, J. and N. Babault, Acute effects of dynamic stretching on muscle flexibility and performance: an analysis of the current literature. Sports medicine, 2018. 48: 299-325.
9. Cejudo, A., Lower extremity flexibility profile in basketball players: Gender differences and injury risk identification. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. 18(22): 11956.
10. George, M., The Effects of Static Versus Dynamic Stretching on Lower Extremity Power Output and Flexibility in Dancers. 2024.
11. Robles-Palazón, F.J., et al., Effects of age and maturation on lower extremity range of motion in male youth soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2022. 36(5): 1417-1425.
12. Su, H., et al., Acute effects of foam rolling, static stretching, and dynamic stretching during warm-ups on muscular flexibility and strength in young adults. Journal of sport rehabilitation, 2017. 26(6): 469-477.
13. Tanaka, M., et al., Effects of Different Amounts of Dynamic Stretching on Musculotendinous Extensibility and Muscle Strength. Applied Sciences, 2024. 14(15): 6745.
14. Washif, J.A. and L.-Y. Kok, Relationships between vertical jump metrics and sprint performance, and qualities that distinguish between faster and slower sprinters. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2022. 4(2): 135-144.
15. Behara, B. and B.H. Jacobson, Acute effects of deep tissue foam rolling and dynamic stretching on muscular strength, power, and flexibility in division I linemen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2017. 31(4): 888-892.
16. Caylan Gurses, K., A. Otag, and O.A. Gurses, Acute effects of dynamic stretching exercises on vertical jump performance and flexibility. Sport Sciences for Health, 2024: 1-7.
17. Fukaya, T., et al., Effects of stretching intensity on range of motion and muscle stiffness: A narrative review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2022. 32: 68-76.
18. Kataura, S., et al., Acute effects of the different intensity of static stretching on flexibility and isometric muscle force. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2017. 31(12): 3403-3410.
19. Arntz, F., et al., Chronic effects of static stretching exercises on muscle strength and power in healthy individuals across the lifespan: a systematic review with multi-level meta-analysis. Sports medicine, 2023. 53(3): 723-745.
20. Hafid, M.I., I. Rini, and E. Sutono. Comparison between static and dynamic stretching in changes of limb muscle strength and flexibility of volleyball players. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. IOP Publishing.
21. Melocchi, I., et al., Effects of different stretching methods on vertical jump ability and range of motion in young female artistic gymnastics athletes. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2020. 61(4): 527-533.
22. Notarnicola, A., et al., Flexibility responses to different stretching methods in young elite basketball players. Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal, 2018. 7(4): 582.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jingzhen Wang, Fang Hu, Xuan Qiu, Han Li
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.