Exploration on the innovation path of physical education teaching: The strategy of integrating personalized training and biosensor technology from the perspective of biomechanics
Abstract
Background: PE is crucial for developing lifelong fitness habits among students. Traditional methods lack personalization and real-time feedback, limiting effectiveness. Biosensor technology, which can monitor various biomechanical parameters, offers a revolutionary approach to transform PE. It enables the provision of personalized training regimens based on each student's unique biomechanical characteristics, such as muscle force exertion patterns, joint kinematics, and body movement biomechanics. Purpose: The research aims to enhance and assess a new model of PE teaching that integrates personalized training with biosensor technology with a specific focus on how it impacts and interacts with the biomechanical and physiological aspects of students' physical performance. Methods: Data collection involves capturing HR, movement patterns, key biomechanical data and exertion levels during physical activities. The collected data are preprocessed using data cleaning and normalization techniques, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of this analysis. Feature extraction uses FFT to analyze the frequency domain characteristics of the physiological signals. The study proposes an ITSO-GRNN strategy aimed at developing PE teaching and personalized training. Results: The application of individual training together with biosensor technology contributes significantly and positively in terms of students’ performance and involvement, resulting in better physical results and good evaluations. The ISTO-GRNN model outperforms all existing methods in terms of physical training (97.80%), assessing students' biomechanical and physiological states (99.62%), and efficiency of the PE teaching process (98.74%). In terms of performance metrics, it performs effectively with accuracy (98.70%), precision (96.50%), recall (90.42%), and F1-score (92.50%) showing teaching effectiveness and evaluation that are highly superior to those of the former models. Conclusion: The study highlights the potential for such innovations to not only improve physical outcomes but also promote lifelong fitness habits among students.
References
1. McKenzie, T.L., Nader, P.R., Strikmiller, P.K., Yang, M., Stone, E.J., Perry, C.L., Taylor, W.C., Epping, J.N., Feldman, H.A., Luepker, R.V. and Kelder, S.H., 1996. School physical education: effect of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. Preventive medicine, 25(4), pp.423-431. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1996.0074
2. RODRIGUES SILVA, R.J., PAULO CUNHA, F.E.R.N.A.N.D.O., COELHO DA SILVA, A.N.A. and FAZENDEIRO BATISTA, P.A.U.L.A., 2024. Empowering students in physical fitness through assessment for learning in physical education. Journal of Physical Education & Sport, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2024.05135
3. Zhu, W. and Li, J., 2022. Analysis and exploration on the integration of mental health education into college physical education practice. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), p.5195909. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5195909
4. Miller, D.N., Gilman, R. and Martens, M.P., 2008. Wellness promotion in the schools: Enhancing students’ mental and physical health. Psychology in the Schools, 45(1), pp.5-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20274
5. Fogarty, J.S., Goodwill, A.M., Tan, A.L. and Tan, S.J., 2023. Student arousal, engagement, and emotion relative to Physical Education periods in school. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, p.100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2023.100215
6. Gerdin, G., 2024. ‘Level the playing field’–pupils’ experiences of inclusion and social justice in physical education and health. Sport, Education and Society, pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2024.2323495
7. Liu, Z. and Chang, L., 2024. Sports Engagement and Leadership Competencies Development in College Students. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 8(3), pp.22-33. https://doi.org/10.54097/0fcr0080
8. Ribeiro, E., Farias, C. and Mesquita, I., 2024. “The Game Changers”: How Equity-Driven Pedagogical Scaffolding Reduces Participation Disparities in Physical Education. Education Sciences, 14(10), p.1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101077
9. Duan, Y., 2024. The Influence of Sports on College Students’ Learning Adaptability. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, pp.832-837. https://doi.org/10.54097/4ct6n844
10. Garcia, M.B., 2024. Watching Exercise and Fitness Videos on TikTok for Physical Education: Motivation, Engagement, and Message Sensation Value. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1(aop), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2024-0084
11. Li, F., 2024. Creation of Deep Learning Scenarios in the Network Teaching of Physical Education Technical Courses. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 25(1), pp.271-284. https://doi.org/10.12694/scpe.v25i1.2294
12. Li, Z., 2024. Image analysis and teaching strategy optimization of folk dance training based on the deep neural network. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p.10909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61134-y
13. Chen, W. and Chen, W., A Thematic Microgrid Teaching Model for Physical Education Based on SSA Optimization Algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00338
14. Wang, D. and Chen, Y., 2024. Research on the Application of Big Data in College Physical Education Teaching and Training. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0756
15. Hou, X., Fang, D. and Guo, J., 2024. Research on personalized path recommendation of college physical education online teaching based on improved particle swarm optimization. Revistamultidisciplinar de las Ciencias del Deporte, 24(94). https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2024.94.009
16. Lu, Y., 2024. Analysis of Influencing Factors on the Quality of Teaching Reform of Physical Education Courses in Colleges and Universities Combined with Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Modeling. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0143
17. Mishra, N., Habal, B.G.M., Garcia, P.S. and Garcia, M.B., 2024, June. Harnessing an AI-Driven Analytics Model to Optimize Training and Treatment in Physical Education for Sports Injury Prevention. In Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 309-315). https://doi.org/10.1145/3678726.3678740
18. Song, X., 2024. Physical education teaching mode assisted by artificial intelligence assistant under the guidance of high-order complex network. Scientific reports, 14(1), p.4104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53964-7
19. Jiang, X., Du, Y. and Zheng, Y., 2024. Evaluation of physical education teaching effect using Random Forest model under artificial intelligence. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23576
20. Zhang, Z. and Li, S., 2024. A Study on the Development of Professional Training in Physical Education in Colleges and Universities under Information Technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01499
21. Li, H., Cui, C. and Jiang, S., 2024. Strategy for improving the football teaching quality by AI and metaverse-empowered in mobile internet environment. Wireless Networks, 30(5), pp.4343-4352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03000-1
22. Acut, D.P., Lobo, J.T. and Garcia, M.B., 2025. Determinants of Teachers’ Intentions to Integrate Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Into Physical Education and Health Curricula. In Global Innovations in Physical Education and Health (pp. 439-472). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3952-7.ch016
23. Guo, R., 2024. Analysis of artificial intelligence technology and its application in improving the effectiveness of physical education teaching. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 19(1), pp.1-15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.335115
24. Zhao, G., Sun, K., Fu, J., Li, Z., Liu, D., Tian, X., Yang, J. and Zhang, Q., 2024. Impact of physical activity on executive functions: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, p.1226667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1226667
25. Burgueño, R., García-González, L., Abós, Á. and Sevil-Serrano, J., 2024. Students’ motivational experiences across profiles of perceived need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching behaviors in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 29(1), pp.82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2022.2028757
26. Wang, L., 2024. An evaluation method for the effectiveness of physical education. Revistamultidisciplinar de las Ciencias del Deporte, 24(94).https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2024.94.003
27. Li, S., Wang, C. and Wang, Y., 2024. Fuzzy evaluation model for physical education teaching methods in colleges and universities using artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p.4788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53177-y
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
