Mechanical characteristics and construction strategy optimization for foundation design in complex geological conditions
Abstract
In order to improve the reliability and efficiency of foundation design in complex geological environments, this paper proposes a computer-assisted mechanical characterization model based on biomechanical principles, which is combined with bionic design methods to optimize the construction strategy. By integrating the stress distribution and deformation mechanism of biomaterials, this paper designs a foundation structure that is more adaptable to the geological uncertainty, and uses optimization algorithms and dynamic feedback mechanisms to analyze the foundation bearing capacity, settlement control and structural response. The results show that the optimized model significantly improves the foundation safety, reduces the overall construction cost, and provides valuable guidance for engineering practice.
References
1. Jindal S, Rahmanli U, Aleem M, et al. Geotechnical challenges in monopile foundations and performance assessment of current design methodologies. Ocean Engineering. 2024; 310: 118469. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118469
2. Zhang Q, Zhang H, Wang L, et al. Effect of structural characteristics on the stability of multi-weak rock slopes considering the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82296-9
3. Studziński R, Ścigałło J, Ratajczak M, et al. Impact of Heterogeneous Soil Conditions on the Life Cycle Assessment of a Multi-Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure. Sustainability. 2024; 16(16): 6771. doi: 10.3390/su16166771
4. Jin Z, Jin YF, Yin ZY, et al. Evolution of bearing capacity and macroelement modelling for suction caisson foundations in sand considering local scour. Computers and Geotechnics. 2025; 179: 106985. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106985
5. Hosseinpour I, Almeida MSS, Riccio M, et al. Strength and Compressibility Characteristics of a Soft Clay Subjected to Ground Treatment. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2017; 35(3): 1051-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10706-017-0161-8
6. Salimi M, Ghorbani A. Mechanical and compressibility characteristics of a soft clay stabilized by slag-based mixtures and geopolymers. Applied Clay Science. 2020; 184: 105390. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2019.105390
7. Puri VK, Prakash S. Foundations for Dynamic Loads. In Art of Foundation Engineering Practice. 2010; 517-533. doi: 10.1061/41093(372)26
8. Otake Y, Honjo Y. Challenges in geotechnical design revealed by reliability assessment: Review and future perspectives. Soils and Foundations. 2022; 62(3): 101129. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101129
9. Gosline JM, Guerette PA, Ortlepp CS, et al. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1999; 202(23): 3295-3303. doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3295
10. Meyers MA, Chen PY, Lin AYM, et al. Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties. Progress in Materials Science. 2008; 53(1): 1-206. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002
11. Guo L, Du D, Li W, et al. Efficiency of in-wall weave patterns on the mechanical properties of integrally woven carbon/carbon honeycomb structures. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2024; 27(3): 651-671. doi: 10.1177/10996362241308557
12. Onyelowe KC, Mojtahedi FF, Ebid AM, et al. Selected AI optimization techniques and applications in geotechnical engineering. Cogent Engineering. 2022; 10(1). doi: 10.1080/23311916.2022.2153419
13. Martinez A, Dejong J, Akin I, et al. Bio-inspired geotechnical engineering: principles, current work, opportunities and challenges. Géotechnique. 2022; 72(8): 687-705. doi: 10.1680/jgeot.20.p.170
14. Zhao Y, Dai S. Challenges of rock drilling and opportunities from bio-boring. Biogeotechnics. 2023; 1(1): 100009. doi: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100009
15. Rahimi B, Sharifzadeh M, Feng XT. A comprehensive underground excavation design (CUED) methodology for geotechnical engineering design of deep underground mining and tunneling. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2021; 143: 104684. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104684
16. Rayfield EJ. Finite Element Analysis and Understanding the Biomechanics and Evolution of Living and Fossil Organisms. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 2007; 35(1): 541-576. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140104
17. Zhang W, Xiang J, Huang R, et al. A review of bio-inspired geotechnics-perspectives from geomaterials, geo-components, and drilling & excavation strategies. Biogeotechnics. 2023; 1(3): 100025. doi: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100025
18. Li Z, Lv J, Xie X, et al. Mechanical Characteristics of Structures and Ground Deformation Caused by Shield Tunneling Under-Passing Highways in Complex Geological Conditions Based on the MJS Method. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(19): 9323. doi: 10.3390/app11199323
19. Wang Q, Gao H, Jiang B, et al. In-situ test and bolt-grouting design evaluation method of underground engineering based on digital drilling. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2021; 138: 104575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104575
20. Ma X, Liu Z, Wang W, et al. Characteristics of physical parameters and predictive modeling of mechanical properties in loess-like silty clay for engineering geology. Engineering Geology. 2024; 339: 107672. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107672
21. Zhang Y, Wang X, Jiang C, et al. Biomechanical research of medial femoral circumflex vascularized bone-grafting in the treatment of early-to-mid osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a finite element analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022; 17(1). doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03335-7
22. Zhang D. Seismic Performance Assessment and Enhancement Strategies for Civil Engineering Structures. Academic Journal of Science and Technology. 2024; 10(1): 155-158. doi: 10.54097/40bet123
23. Kashani AR, Chiong R, Mirjalili S, et al. Particle Swarm Optimization Variants for Solving Geotechnical Problems: Review and Comparative Analysis. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2020; 28(3): 1871-1927. doi: 10.1007/s11831-020-09442-0
24. Platt GM, Yang XS, Silva Neto AJ, et al. Computational Intelligence, Optimization and Inverse Problems with Applications in Engineering. Springer International Publishing; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96433-1
25. Dong X. Effective Approaches of Interdisciplinary Collaboration In the Foundation Design Course. Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design. Published online 2024. doi: 10.54941/ahfe1005124
26. Formenton ABK, de Mello Roesler CR, Vassoler JM. Biomechanical properties of tendons and the relationship with their microstructure. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2024; 46(8). doi: 10.1007/s40430-024-05068-6
27. Galbusera F, Innocenti B. Ligament and tendon biomechanics. Human Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Published online 2022: 137-149. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824481-4.00016-0
28. Pieczyńska-Kozłowska J, Vessia G. Spatially variable soils affecting geotechnical strip foundation design. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2022; 14(3): 886-895. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.10.010
29. Pant A, Paul E, Niebur GL, et al. Integration of mechanics and biology in computer simulation of bone remodeling. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2021; 164: 33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.05.001
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
