Biosensor-based strategies for promoting innovation and assessing occupational health risks among college students

  • Fang Li Wuhan Business University, Wuhan 430056, China
Keywords: college students; health hazards; entrepreneurship; biosensor; Flower Pollination Optimizer Tuned Gate refined Long Short Term Memory (FPO-GLSTM)
Article ID: 820

Abstract

Higher education was increasingly emphasizing innovation and entrepreneurship strategy, encouraging college students to develop creative talents. The intense needs of both academic and entrepreneurial tasks provide serious occupational health hazards that affect students’ physical and emotional health. This paper provides a novel approach to risk assessment and management that combines biosensor technology and artificial intelligence (AI). The emphasis is on applying a novel Flower Pollination Optimizer Tuned Gate refined Long Short Term Memory (FPO-GLSTM) method to monitor and forecast health issues, such as stress, physical strain, and other risk factors in education and entrepreneurship situations. Data were gathered using biosensors that monitored physiological characteristics, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and stress levels in real-time. To capture crucial health information, the data was pre-processed with min-max normalization, and features were extracted using the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT). The FPO-GLSTM model to forecast potential health hazards and make individualized recommendations. The outcomes demonstrate that the FPO-GLSTM-based model accurately and precisely forecasts health risks, including stress-induced conditions. AI and biosensor data integration offer a viable way to monitor and manage health risks for students, improving their health in educational and entrepreneurial environments.

References

1. Haojie, G., 2022. Innovation and entrepreneurship strategies of teachers and students in financial colleges and universities under the direction of food security. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.848554.

2. Sankaran, S., Rajasekaran, M.P. and Sivapragasam, C., 2020. Project-based learning novel approach to teaching biosensors and transducers course for engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(1), pp.61–69.

3. Chang, S.H., Shu, Y., Wang, C.L., Chen, M.Y. and Ho, W.S., 2020. Cyber-entrepreneurship as an innovative orientation: Does positive thinking moderate the relationship between cyber-entrepreneurial self-efficacy and cyber-entrepreneurial intentions in Non-IT students? Computers in Human Behavior, 107, p.105975.

4. Jena, R.K., 2020. Measuring the impact of business management Student’s attitude towards entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, p.106275.

5. Boldureanu, G., Ionescu, A.M., Bercu, A.M., Bedrule-Grigoruță, M.V. and Boldureanu, D., 2020. Entrepreneurship education through successful entrepreneurial models in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 12(3), p.1267.

6. Liu, Y., 2020. The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, p.120294.

7. Wardana, L.W., Narmaditya, B.S., Wibowo, A., Mahendra, A.M., Wibowo, N.A., Harwida, G. and Rohman, A.N., 2020. The impact of entrepreneurship education and students’ entrepreneurial mindset: the mediating role of attitude and self-efficacy. Heliyon, 6(9).

8. Fassbender, U., Papenbrock, J. and Pilz, M., 2022. Teaching entrepreneurship to life-science students through Problem-Based Learning. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), p.100685.

9. Oliveira, A.W. and Brown, A.O., 2022. Experiencing the entrepreneurial side of science: undergraduate students pitching science-based businesses. Entrepreneurship Education, 5(4), pp.367–397.

10. Thurik, A.R., Audretsch, D.B., Block, J.H., Burke, A., Carree, M.A., Dejardin, M., Rietveld, C.A., Sanders, M., Stephan, U. and Wiklund, J., 2024. The impact of entrepreneurship research on other academic fields. Small Business Economics, 62(2), pp.727–751.

11. He, M. and Zhang, J., 2023. Evaluating the innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges using BP neural network. Soft Computing, 27(19), pp.14361–14377.

12. Yu, H., Zhang, R. and Kim, C., 2023. Intelligent analysis system of college students’ employment and entrepreneurship situation: Big data and artificial intelligence-driven approach. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 110, p.108823.

13. Ojeda-Beltrán, A., Solano-Barliza, A., Arrubla-Hoyos, W., Ortega, D.D., Cama-Pinto, D., Holgado-Terriza, J.A., Damas, M., Toscano-Vanegas, G. and Cama-Pinto, A., 2023. Characterization of Youth Entrepreneurship in Medellín-Colombia Using Machine Learning. Sustainability, 15(13), p.10297.

14. Lu, Q., Chai, Y., Ren, L., Ren, P., Zhou, J. and Lin, C., 2023. Research on quality evaluation of innovation and entrepreneurship education for college students based on random forest algorithm and logistic regression model. Peerj computer science, 9, p.e1329.

15. High, P. and Alagic, A., 2023. “Design a Sensor”: Implementation of Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning in Undergraduate General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), pp.1557–1563.

16. Ebrahimi, P., Dustmohammadloo, H., Kabiri, H., Bouzari, P. and Fekete-Farkas, M., 2023. Transformational Entrepreneurship and Digital Platforms: A Combination of ISM-MICMAC and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), p.118.

17. Schade, P. and Schuhmacher, M.C., 2023. Predicting entrepreneurial activity using machine learning. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, p.e00357.

18. Bell, R., 2021. Underpinning the entrepreneurship educator’s toolkit: Conceptualising the influence of educational philosophies and theory. Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), pp.1–18.

19. Bonsaksen, T., Magne, T.A., Stigen, L., Gramstad, A., Åsli, L., Mørk, G., Johnson, S.G. and Carstensen, T., 2021. Associations between occupational therapy students’ academic performance and their study approaches and perceptions of the learning environment. BMC Medical Education, 21, pp.1–8.

20. Kakkar, S., Kwapinski, W., Howard, C.A., and Kumar, K.V., 2021. Deep neural networks in chemical engineering classrooms to accurately model adsorption equilibrium data. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, pp.115–127.

21. Verdugo, G.B. and Villarroel, A.V., 2021. Measuring the association between students’ exposure to social media and their valuation of sustainability in entrepreneurship. Heliyon, 7(6).

22. Pan, S., Hafez, B., Iskandar, A. and Ming, Z., 2024. Integrating constructivist principles in an adaptive hybrid learning system for developing social entrepreneurship education among college students. Learning and Motivation, 87, p.102023.

23. Allil, K., 2024. Integrating AI-driven marketing analytics techniques into the classroom: pedagogical strategies for enhancing student engagement and future business success. Journal of Marketing Analytics, pp.1–27.

24. Nguyen, P.N.D. and Nguyen, H.H., 2024. Unveiling the link between digital entrepreneurship education and intention among university students in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, p.123330.

25. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ziya07/student-health-data

Published
2024-12-20
How to Cite
Li, F. (2024). Biosensor-based strategies for promoting innovation and assessing occupational health risks among college students. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 21(4), 820. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb820
Section
Article