Biomechanical perspectives on bio-molecular environmental regulation: Long-term strategies
Abstract
Environmentally conscious practices can be encouraged in many organisations through this study, which has the potential to change our understanding of bio-molecular interactions in natural systems. There is an immediate need for innovative approaches to environmentally responsible bio-molecule management due to the critical nature of environmental problems such as pollution, climate change, and resource depletion. Using state-of-the-art computational biomechanics and organic sciences, this study presents an approach to environmental governance known as Integrative Biomechanical Modelling for Environmental Governance Technique (IBM-EGT). A combination of environmental parameterization, advanced biomechanical modelling, and excellent data sets allows the IBM-EGT method to describe the behaviour of biomolecules in a wide variety of natural settings. By factoring in environmental variables like temperature, pH, and pollutant concentrations, IBM-EGT provides a comprehensive picture of bio-molecular dynamics in response to environmental stimuli. Biomaterials, bioremediation, pharmaceuticals, and even agriculture are just a few of the many potential sectors that can profit from IBM-EGT. Agricultural operations can be optimised, green medicines can be introduced, sustainable biomaterials can be developed, and diseased regions can be cleaned up with its help. Because it enables the prediction of bio-molecular interactions and behaviour in complex environmental contexts, simulation analysis is a fundamental topic of IBM-EGT. In an effort to find the best ways to conduct activities while reducing negative environmental impacts and increasing positive ones, IBM-EGT does scenario analysis based on simulations. The studies mentioned here help keep the environment and people healthy by elucidating the nature of the connection between Bio-Molecules and their herbal environment. Furthermore, it enables the development of plans for the distant future.
References
1. Sharma A, Clemens RA, Garcia O, et al. Biomanufacturing in low Earth orbit for regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Reports. 2022; 17(1): 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.12.001
2. Auría-Soro C, Nesma T, Juanes-Velasco P, et al. Interactions of Nanoparticles and Biosystems: Microenvironment of Nanoparticles and Biomolecules in Nanomedicine. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019; 9(10): 1365. doi: 10.3390/nano9101365
3. Revete A, Aparicio A, Cisterna BA, et al. Advancements in the Use of Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine: Properties and Biomedical Applications. Narain R, ed. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2022; 2022: 1-16. doi: 10.1155/2022/3606765
4. da Silva EL, Galmarini S, Maurizi L, et al. Solid State Chemistry: Computational Chemical Analysis for Materials Science. In: Computational Techniques for Analytical Chemistry and Bioanalysis. pp. 287-334.
5. Holkar K, Vaidya A, Pethe P, et al. Biomaterials and extracellular vesicles in cell-free therapy for bone repair and regeneration: Future line of treatment in regenerative medicine. Materialia. 2020; 12: 100736. doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100736
6. Cutolo A, Carotenuto AR, Cutolo MA, et al. Ultrasound waves in tumors via needle irradiation for precise medicine. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10407-5
7. Jafari A, Khanmohammadi Chenab K, Malektaj H, et al. An attempt of stimuli-responsive drug delivery of graphene-based nanomaterial through biological obstacles of tumor. FlatChem. 2022; 34: 100381. doi: 10.1016/j.flatc.2022.100381
8. Andalib TW, Bin Khalid Z, Mishra P. Technoeconomics and lifecycle assessment of bioreactors: wastewater treatment plant management. In: Techno-economics and Life Cycle Assessment of Bioreactors. Elsevier; pp. 95-129.
9. Abalymov A, Parakhonskiy B, Skirtach A. Polymer- and Hybrid-Based Biomaterials for Interstitial, Connective, Vascular, Nerve, Visceral and Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. Polymers. 2020; 12(3): 620. doi: 10.3390/polym12030620
10. Kourkoumelis N, Zhang X, Lin Z, et al. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of Bone Tissue: Bone Quality Assessment in Preclinical and Clinical Applications of Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture. Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2019; 17(1): 24-39. doi: 10.1007/s12018-018-9255-y
11. Pardeshi S, Damiri F, Zehravi M, et al. Functional Thermoresponsive Hydrogel Molecule to Material Design for Biomedical Applications. Polymers. 2022; 14(15): 3126. doi: 10.3390/polym14153126
12. Chi PY, Spuul P, Tseng FG, et al. Cell migration in microfluidic devices: invadosomes formation in confined environments. Cell Migrations: Causes and Functions. 2019; 79-103.
13. Madiwale P, Singh GP, Biranje S, et al. Advances of Textiles in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Advances in Functional Finishing of Textiles. 2020; 169-194.
14. Singh G, Singh S, Kumar R, et al. Tissues and organ printing: An evolution of technology and materials. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2022; 236(12): 1695-1710. doi: 10.1177/09544119221125084
15. Nisha A, Bhardwaj R, Verma M, et al. Functionalized nanoclays in bioactive materials. Composite Interfaces. 2023; 1-25.
16. Russo T, De Santis R, Peluso V, et al. Multifunctional Bioactive Magnetic Scaffolds with Tailored Features for Bone Tissue Engineering. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Human Health and Medicine: Current Medical Applications and Alternative Therapy of Cancer. 2021; 87-112.
17. dos Santos Haupenthal DP, Resmini MB, Da Silva LA, et al. Intra-articular Treatment with Triamcinolone Hexacetonide Associated with Gold Nanoparticles Reduces Cartilage Degeneration in an Animal Model of Osteoarthritis. Current Drug Targets. 2023; 24(3): 287-296.
18. Sharma P, Gaur VK, Sirohi R, et al. Sustainable processing of food waste for production of bio-based products for circular bioeconomy. Bioresource Technology. 2021; 325: 124684. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124684
19. Chakraborty S, Bera D, Roy L, et al. Biomimetic and bioinspired nanostructures: recent developments and applications. Bioinspired and Green Synthesis of Nanostructures: A Sustainable Approach. 2023; 353-404.
20. Boija A, Klein IA, Young RA. Biomolecular Condensates and Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021; 39(2): 174-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.12.003
21. Acciaretti F, Vesentini S, Cipolla L. Fabrication Strategies Towards Hydrogels for Biomedical Application: Chemical and Mechanical Insights. Chemistry—An Asian Journal. 2022; 17(22). doi: 10.1002/asia.202200797
22. Datta S, Das S, Barua R. Self‐Sustained Nanobiomaterials: Innovative Materials for Biomedical Applications. Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Techniques for Biomedical Applications. 2023; 303-323.
23. Kloppenburg S, Gupta A, Kruk SRL, et al. Scrutinizing environmental governance in a digital age: New ways of seeing, participating, and intervening. One Earth. 2022; 5(3): 232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.004
24. Jager NW, Newig J, Challies E, et al. Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2019; 30(3): 383-399. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muz034
25. Available online: https://datasetsearch.research.google.com/search?src=0&query=Environmental%20governance&docid=L2cvMTFsa2dsbmo0Mw%3D%3D (accessed on 21 January 2024).
Copyright (c) 2024 Xuewen Du
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
