Prevention of knee joint injuries in football basic training under the constraints of biomechanics model
Abstract
Traditional research on knee injury prevention lacks scientific and targeted research due to the lack of biomechanics quantitative analysis and the failure to fully incorporate the specificity of football, making it difficult to effectively reduce the risk of injuries to athletes. This paper solves the problems of insufficient quantification and lack of specificity in traditional research by introducing a biomechanics model. This paper uses open source 3D modeling software to construct an anatomical model of the knee joint, uses an ordinary camera combined with Kinovea software to analyze the motion trajectory of the knee joint, uses IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) sensors to collect motion data, and uses OpenSim software to perform force analysis. Based on these analysis results, this paper designs a personalized knee injury prevention training program and conducts a basic training comparison experiment. The medial-lateral stress ratio of the knee joint in the experimental group is eventually reduced to 0.92, which reduces the peak force on the knee joint, improves knee joint stability, and the injury risk score fluctuation decreases during training, with the lowest being 7.3. The results show that the solution proposed in this paper provides scientific, systematic and practical guidance for the prevention of knee injuries in basic football training, and improves the safety and effectiveness of training.
References
1. Emery C A, Pasanen K. Current trends in sport injury prevention. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2019, 33(1): 3-15.
2. Jeong J, Choi D H, Shin C S. Core strength training can alter neuromuscular and biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. The American journal of sports medicine, 2021, 49(1): 183-192.
3. Goes R A, Lopes L R, Cossich V R A, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries in athletes from five modalities: a cross-sectional study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020, 21: 1-9.
4. Samhan L F, Alfarra A H, Abu-Naser S S. An expert system for knee problems diagnosis. International Journal of Academic Information Systems Research (IJAISR), 2021, 5(4): 59-66.
5. Dijksma I, Arslan I G, van Etten‐Jamaludin F S, et al. Exercise Programs to reduce the risk of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Military personnel: a systematic review and Meta‐analysis. PM&R, 2020, 12(10): 1028-1037.
6. Vincent H K, Brownstein M, Vincent K R. Injury prevention, safe training techniques, rehabilitation, and return to sport in trail runners. Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022, 4(1): e151-e162.
7. Friedl K E, Looney D P. With life there is motion. Activity biomarkers signal important health and performance outcomes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2023, 26: S3-S8.
8. Plakias S, Tsatalas T, Mina M A, et al. A bibliometric analysis of soccer biomechanics. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(15): 6430-6445.
9. Rana M, Mittal V. Wearable sensors for real-time kinematics analysis in sports: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 21(2): 1187-1207.
10. Hughes T, Jones R K, Starbuck C, et al. The value of tibial mounted inertial measurement units to quantify running kinetics in elite football (soccer) players. A reliability and agreement study using a research orientated and a clinically orientated system. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2019, 44: 156-164.
11. Yurova A, Lychagin A, Kalinsky E, et al. Automated personalization of biomechanical knee model. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2024: 1-12.
12. Tedesco S, Torre O M, Belcastro M, et al. Design of a multi-sensors wearable platform for remote monitoring of knee rehabilitation. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 98309-98328.
13. Salamon D, Stachowiak J, Sosin J, et al. Knee injuries in football–types, circumstances, impact and prevention. Quality in Sport, 2024, 34: 56199-56199.
14. Makuch R, Kucharski A, Pilarski K, et al. Knee joint injuries in football players: types of injuries, etiology, diagnostics and prevention. Quality in Sport, 2024, 15: 51945-51945.
15. Farshidfar S S, Cadman J, Deng D, et al. The effect of modelling parameters in the development and validation of knee joint models on ligament mechanics: a systematic review. PLoS One, 2022, 17(1): e0262684-e0262717.
16. Shu L, Li S, Sugita N. Systematic review of computational modelling for biomechanics analysis of total knee replacement. Biosurface and Biotribology, 2020, 6(1): 3-11.
17. Logerstedt D S, Ebert J R, MacLeod T D, et al. Effects of and Response to Mechanical Loading on the Knee. Sports Medicine, 2022, 52(2): 201-235.
18. Zhao F. The Application of Sports Biomechanics in Sports Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Sport Research, 2024, 6(3): 142-147.
19. Olivares-Jabalera J, Fílter-Ruger A, Dos’ Santos T, et al. Exercise-based training strategies to reduce the incidence or mitigate the risk factors of anterior cruciate ligament injury in adult football (soccer) players: a systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021, 18(24): 13351-13386.
20. Xu H. Prevention and rehabilitation measures for knee injuries during sports training. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 2024, 21(1): 149-149.
21. Malaichamy S, Kumbhar S. Football players’ combined effect of coordination, balance, proprioception and core stability exercises in terms of injury prevention and improvement of performance: A randomised trial. 2023, 10(3): 174-179.
22. Song T. Biomechanical mechanisms and prevention strategies of knee joint injuries on football: An in-depth analysis based on athletes’ movement patterns. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 2024, 21(3): 524-524.
23. Roupa I, da Silva M R, Marques F, et al. On the modeling of biomechanical systems for human movement analysis: a narrative review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(7): 4915-4958.
24. Mansour M, Serbest K, Kutlu M, et al. Estimation of lower limb joint moments based on the inverse dynamics approach: a comparison of machine learning algorithms for rapid estimation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2023, 61(12): 3253-3276.
25. Sadeqi S, Norte G E, Murray A, et al. Effect of whole body parameters on knee joint biomechanics: implications for ACL injury prevention during single-leg landings. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2023, 51(8): 2098-2109.
26. Ghnatios C, Hage I, Metni N. Knee joint injury risk assessment by means of experimental measurements and proper generalized decomposition. Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, 2021, 349(2): 345-369.
27. Lloyd D. The future of in-field sports biomechanics: Wearables plus modelling compute real-time in vivo tissue loading to prevent and repair musculoskeletal injuries. Sports Biomechanics, 2024, 23(10): 1284-1312.
28. ZhaoriGetu H, Li C. Innovation in physical education teaching based on biomechanics feedback: Design and evaluation of personalized training programs. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 2024, 21(2): 403-403.
29. Zeidan A A, Ma A K. Anatomically and Biomechanically Accurate 3D Modeling of the Human Knee Joint. Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society, 2020, 32(1): 9-15.
30. Sinthania D, Nazri S B M, Kardi I S. Biomechanical measurement with motion analysis system via software (Kinovea): A case studies on motion and degree of joint in hurdles athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2023, 23(12): 3189-3195.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jinhui Li, Wei Fu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
