Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)
-
Open Access
Article
Creators’ perceptions and attitudes toward using generative artificial intelligence: Exploring posts and comments related to AIGC design learning on a Chinese social media platform with a mixed-method approachWenyi Li
Artificial Intelligence and Education, 1(1), 1624, 2025, DOI: 10.62617/aie1624
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) has been found to play a crucial role in the field of design, where its significance in various creative clusters has been increasingly recognized. However, the lack of in-depth understanding of creators’ AIGC learning experiences and sentiments in the design area has become an obstacle to the further development of targeted educational programs and industry-relevant initiatives. It remains unclear what specific clusters of AIGC design learning creators are focusing on and what kinds of attitudes, positive or negative, they hold towards these different clusters within the field. To bridge these gaps, this study collected 9992 posts and comments related to AIGC design learning on a Chinese social media platform called Xiaohongshu. A mixed-method approach was applied by combining word cloud, sentiment analysis, co-word analysis, and social network analysis. Using word cloud and sentiment analysis, this research aimed to uncover the key perceptions and sentiment orientations creators focused on in their expression. Social network analysis and co-word matrix were used to identify central concepts, their connections and clusters of related terms. The result differentiates creators’ perceptions into the following clusters: tools and technical foundations for AIGC design, application domains of AIGC design, cultural elements used in AIGC, semantic nuances in AIGC terminology, AIGC design methods, creativity and innovation in AIGC design, future-oriented perspectives in AIGC design for professional development, and AIGC design ethics. Moreover, it presents the tendencies and proportions of creators’ attitudes in the above clusters in four main sentiment categories: positive, moderately positive, moderately negative, and negative. This study is expected to have implications in providing practical guidance for educators to optimize AIGC design teaching strategies, thereby better meeting learners’ emotional needs and increasing their willingness to learn AIGC design knowledge, as well as helping the industry develop better AIGC-designed products.
-
Open Access
Editorial
Artificial intelligence, the new trend and challenge of educationChangling Peng, Shuai Liu
Artificial Intelligence and Education, 1(1), 2051, 2025, DOI: 10.62617/aie2051
Abstract:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), first proposed at the Dartmouth Conference in 1956, has achieved remarkable achievements with near 70 years' development. With the continuous development of AI, especially the rise of generative AI (GAI) since ChatGPT, also called Large Language Models (LLMs), it has transformed educational landscapes globally [1]. Recently, the integration of AI/GAI in education (AIED) has become focused point, mainly introducing AI to create better personalized learning experience, propose adaptive assessment methods, and construct human-like tutoring systems [2]. In the future, AIED is expected to further promote the digital and intelligent transformation of education.