Biomimetic research on posture optimization of sprinters: Inspiration from high-speed moving organisms in nature
Abstract
Biomechanics of sprinters’ posture is critical to maximizing speed and efficiency. Inspired by high-speed organisms in nature, such as cheetahs and falcons, this research examines biomimetic principles to optimize sprinters’ running posture. High-speed animals possess unique anatomical and mechanical traits, allowing remarkable acceleration, stability, and energy efficiency. These characteristics provide valuable insights into improving human sprinting performance. The investigation begins with an in-depth analysis of these organisms’ musculoskeletal systems and movement patterns, focusing on their body alignment, limb positioning, and force application during high-speed locomotion. This data is the foundation for developing biomechanical models applicable to human sprinters. The models are further validated through motion capture technology and simulations, where adjustments to sprinters’ postures are tested for speed, stride length, and energy efficiency improvements. Results from the experiments show a significant reduction in energy wastage and increased propulsion when sprinters adopt optimized postures inspired by natural high-speed organisms. Key adaptations include adjustments in trunk alignment, arm movement coordination, and lower limb force generation, closely mirroring the dynamic posture control seen in nature. This research demonstrates that adopting biomimetic insights leads to measurable sprinting efficiency and performance enhancements. The findings also contribute to developing training protocols for athletes, focusing on optimizing posture based on natural biomechanics.
References
1. Burgess, S. Universal optimal design in the vertebrate limb pattern and lessons for bioinspired design. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 2024; 19(5), 051004.
2. Burden, S. A., Libby, T., Jayaram, K., Sponberg, S., Donelan, J. M. Why animals can outrun robots. Science Robotics. 2024; 9(89), eadi9754
3. Hernández-Flores, E. A., Hernández-Rodríguez, Y. M., Munguía-Fuentes, R., Bayareh-Mancilla, R., & Cigarroa-Mayorga, O. E. Acinonyx jubatus-Inspired Quadruped Robotics: Integrating Neural Oscillators for Enhanced Locomotion Control. Biomimetics. 2024; 9(6), 318.
4. Masoomi, S. F. An efficient biomimetic swimming robot capable of multiple gaits of locomotion: design, modeling, and fabrication. 2019.
5. Uchida, T. K., & Delp, S. L. Biomechanics of movement: the science of sports, robotics, and rehabilitation. MIT Press. 2021.
6. McGowan, C. P., Grabowski, A. M., McDermott, W. J., Herr, H. M., & Kram, R. Leg stiffness of sprinters using running-specific prostheses. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2022; 9(73), 1975–1982.
7. Wang, K., Ren, L., Qian, Z., Liu, J., Geng, T., & Ren, L. Development of a 3D printed bipedal robot: towards humanoid research platform to study human musculoskeletal biomechanics. Journal of Bionic Engineering. 2021; 18, 150–170.
8. Jiang, L., Xu, Z., Zheng, T., Zhang, X., & Yang, J. Research on Dynamic Modeling Method and Flying Gait Characteristics of Quadruped Robots with Flexible Spines. Biomimetics. 2024; 9(3), 132.
9. Shield, S., Muramatsu, N., Da Silva, Z., & Patel, A. Chasing the Cheetah: how field biomechanics has evolved to keep up with the fastest land animal. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2023; 226(Suppl_1), jeb245122.
10. Moryl, D. L. A Study on Aphonopelma Seemanni Biomechanics of Motion with Emphasis on Potential for Biomimetic Robotics Design (Master’s thesis, Purdue University). 2020.
11. Zhao, G. Bio-inspired Approaches for Human Locomotion: From Concepts to Applications. 2020.
12. Hunt, N. H. Cognitive Biomechanics of Arboreal Locomotion. University of California. 2017; Berkeley.
13. Wang, Z., Feng, Y., Wang, B., Yuan, J., Zhang, B., Song, Y., & Dai, Z. Device for Measuring Contact Reaction Forces during Animal Adhesion Landing/Takeoff from Leaf-like Compliant Substrates. Biomimetics. 2024; 9(3), 141.
14. Fukuhara, A., Koizumi, Y., Suzuki, S., Kano, T., & Ishiguro, A. Decentralized control mechanism for body–limb coordination in quadruped running. Adaptive Behavior. 2020; 28(3), 151–164.
15. Valamatos, M. J., Abrantes, J. M., Carnide, F., Valamatos, M. J., & Monteiro, C. P. Biomechanical performance factors in the track and field sprint start: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(7), 4074.
16. Sado, N., Yoshioka, S., & Fukashiro, S. Mechanism of the maintenance of sagittal trunk posture in maximal sprint running. Japanese Journal of Biomechanics in Sports and Exercise. 2016; 20(2), 56–64.
17. Bezodis, N. E., Willwacher, S., & Salo, A. I. T. The biomechanics of the track and field sprint start: a narrative review. Sports medicine. 2019; 49(9), 1345–1364.
18. Robertson, D. G. E., Caldwell, G. E., Hamill, J., Kamen, G., & Whittlesey, S. Research methods in biomechanics. Human kinetics. 2013.
19. Emonds, A. L., & Mombaur, K. Optimality Studies of Human Sprinting Motions with and Without Running-Specific Prostheses. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics. 2019; 16(03), 1940003.
20. Castro-Santos, T., Kieffer, M., & Goerig, E. Sprinting performance and behavior of adult shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2024.
21. Kraskura, K., Patterson, D. A., & Eliason, E. J. A review of adult salmon maximum swim performance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, (ja). 2024.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jing Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.