Research on the application of biomechanics analysis in optimizing physical education movement techniques
Abstract
College and university students’ general health, fitness, and well-being are greatly enhanced by physical education. As various educational institutions work to improve the efficacy of their physical education programs, more evidence-based techniques are required. Biomechanics, to the movement or structure of student activities, provides insights into the efficiency and effectiveness of physical movements. This study aims to explore how physical activity movement skills can be systematically improved by the use of biomechanics analysis, leading to improved physical results and increased student participation in sports and fitness activities. In this study, a novel synergistic fibroblast-optimized malleable convolutional neural network (SFO-MCNN) is proposed to enhance teaching practices using a biomechanical framework that integrates movement analysis. The data collected from cameras that record students’ movements, capturing joint angles and body positions, as well as data from sensors are gathered from the Kaggle. The data was preprocessed using data cleaning and normalization for the obtained data. A system for assessing instruction quality was created using the suggested model and improved SFO. The findings show that the proposed algorithm has the greatest evaluations for average skill performance, physical fitness, student happiness, and physical education teaching efficiency. By comparing the outcomes with those of conventional approaches, the effectiveness of the proposed framework in improving physical education teaching techniques has been established.
References
1. Pérez-Castilla, A. and García-Pinillos, F., 2024. Sports Biomechanics Applied to Performance Optimization. Applied Sciences, 14(9), p.3590. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093590
2. Ae, M., 2020. The next steps for expanding and developing sport biomechanics: Winner of the 2019 ISBS Geoffrey Dyson Award. Sports Biomechanics, 19(6), pp.701-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1743745
3. Taborri, J., Keogh, J., Kos, A., Santuz, A., Umek, A., Urbanczyk, C., van der Kruk, E. and Rossi, S., 2020. Sport biomechanics applications using inertial, force, and EMG sensors: A literature overview. Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2020(1), p.2041549. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2041549
4. Brazil, A., Exell, T., Wilson, C. and Irwin, G., 2020. A biomechanical approach to evaluate overload and specificity characteristics within physical preparation exercises. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(10), pp.1140-1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1743065
5. Wallace, B., Knudson, D. and Gheidi, N., 2020. Incorporating problem-based learning with direct instruction improves student learning in undergraduate biomechanics. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, p.100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100258
6. López-Moranchel, I., Franco, E., Urosa, B., Maurelos-Castell, P., Martín-Íñigo, E. and Montes, V., 2021. University students’ experiences of the use of m learning as a training resource for the acquisition of biomechanical knowledge. Education sciences, 11(9), p.479. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090479
7. Glazier, P.S., 2021. Beyond animated skeletons: How can biomechanical feedback be used to enhance sports performance? Journal of Biomechanics, 129, p.110686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110686
8. Trasolini, N.A., Nicholson, K.F., Mylott, J., Bullock, G.S., Hulburt, T.C. and Waterman, B.R., 2022. Biomechanical analysis of the throwing athlete and its impact on return to sport. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 4(1), pp.e83-e91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.027
9. Huifeng, W., Shankar, A. and Vivekananda, G.N., 2021. Modeling and simulation of sprinters’ health promotion strategy based on sports biomechanics. Connection Science, 33(4), pp.1028-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2020.1807467
10. Navandar, A., FríasLópez, D. and Alejo, L.B., 2021. The use of Instagram in the Sports Biomechanics classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p.711779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711779
11. Zulkifli, A.F. and Danis, A., 2022. Technology in physical education: Using movement analysis application to improve feedback on sports skills among undergraduate physical education students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), p.100350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100350
12. Zhang, B., Jin, H. and Duan, X., 2022. Physical education movement and comprehensive health quality intervention under the background of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, p.947731. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947731
13. Chu, Y., Chen, C., Wang, G. and Su, F., 2022. The effect of education model in physical education on student learning behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.944507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944507
14. Li, Z. and Li, F., 2022. Movement analysis and action optimization of physical education teaching practice based on multi-sensing perception. Journal of Sensors, 2022(1), p.5075122. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5075122
15. Xie, M. and Xu, X., 2022. Construction of a college physical education teaching model using multiple intelligences theory. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), p.1837512. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1837512
16. Tan, B., Tian, S., Wang, E., Xiao, L., Cao, K., Zheng, B. and Luo, L., 2023. Research on the development and testing methods of physical education and agility training equipment in universities. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, p.1155490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1155490
17. Huang, X., Yan, Z., Ma, Y. and Liu, H., 2023. The influence of different levels of physical activity and sports performance on the accuracy of dynamic lower limbs balance assessment among Chinese physical education college students. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, p.1184340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1184340
18. Lin, J. and Song, J., 2023. Design of motion capture system in physical education teaching based on machine vision. Soft Computing, pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08779-5
19. Tang, X., 2023. The application of sports mechanics principles in physical education. Frontiers in Sport Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2023.050107
20. Zawadka, M., Smolka, J., Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Lukasik, E., Jablonski, M. and Gawda, P., 2023. The influence of sedentary behavior on lumbar-pelvic kinematics during squatting and forward bending among physically active students. Ergonomics, 66(1), pp.101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2061051
21. O’Brien, W., Philpott, C., Lester, D., Belton, S., Duncan, M.J., Donovan, B., Chambers, F. and Utesch, T., 2023. Motor competence assessment in physical education–convergent validity between fundamental movement skills and functional movement assessments in adolescence. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(3), pp.306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1990241
22. Wallace, B. and Knudson, D., 2024. The effect of course format on student learning in introductory biomechanics courses that utilize low-tech active learning exercises. Sports Biomechanics, 23(2), pp.156-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1830163
23. Fernández-Vázquez, D., Navarro-López, V., Cano-de-la-Cuerda, R., Palacios-Ceña, D., Espada, M., Bores-García, D., Delfa-de-la-Morena, J.M. and Romero-Parra, N., 2024. Influence of Virtual Reality and Gamification Combined with Practice Teaching Style in Physical Education on Motor Skills and Students’ Perceived Effort: A Mixed-Method Intervention Study. Sustainability, 16(4), p.1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041584
24. Ochia, R., 2021. A hybrid teaching method for undergraduate biomechanics lab. Biomedical Engineering Education, 1(1), pp.187-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-020-00033-w
25. Ward, P., Ayvazo, S., Dervent, F., Iserbyt, P. and Kim, I., 2020. Instructional progression and the role of working models in physical education. Quest, 72(4), pp.410-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2020.1766521
26. Muhannad T. Physical Exercise Recognition Dataset. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/muhannadtuameh/exercise-recognition (accessed on 2 October 2024).
27. Liang, R., 2023. Research on the Path of Enhancing Physical Education Teaching in Colleges and Universities Based on the Background of Deep Learning. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01274
28. Liu, Z., 2023. A sustainable strategy for online physical education teaching using ResNet34 and big data. Soft Computing, pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08524-y
Copyright (c) 2024 Ming Li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on all articles published in this journal is retained by the author(s), while the author(s) grant the publisher as the original publisher to publish the article.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which means they can be shared, adapted and distributed provided that the original published version is cited.
Submit a Paper
