The heterogeneous impact of oil price shocks on traditional and modern renewable energy in developed and developing countries
Abstract
The prevalence of renewable energy helps solve environmental problems and strengthens energy security with less dependence on nonrenewable energy, mainly fossil fuels. One important aspect is that renewable energy consists of two components: traditional and modern renewable energy. This paper examines the effects of an oil price shock on these two different types of renewable energy consumption by applying a local projection method to panel data from 147 countries during the period from 1993 to 2015. Our results show that the effects of an oil price shock depend on the development level and the dependence on nonrenewable energy. In highly nonrenewable energy-dependent countries, traditional renewable energy is sensitive to oil price changes, irrespective of their development levels. However, both traditional and modern renewable energy are insensitive to oil price changes in less nonrenewable energy-dependent countries, regardless of their development levels. Meanwhile, an oil price shock positively affects modern renewable energy in developed countries with high dependence on nonrenewable energy, but not in developing countries. These results provide important policy implications for policymakers and investors to foster modern renewable energy and call for balancing macroeconomic development with environmental benefits and costs.
References
1. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2020—Analysis. IEA; 2020.
2. IEA. Modern Renewables—SDG7: Data and Projections—Analysis. IEA; 2020.
3. UNCTAD. The Role of Science, Technology, and Innovation in Promoting Renewable Energy by 2030. United Nations; 2019.
4. Goldemberg J, Coelho ST. Renewable energy—traditional biomass vs. Modern biomass. Energy Policy 2004; 32(6): 711–714. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00340-3
5. Akintande OJ, Olubusoye OE, Adenikinju AF, et al. Modeling the determinants of renewable energy consumption: Evidence from the five most populous nations in Africa. Energy 2020; 206: 117992. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117992
6. Ergun SJ, Owusu PA, Rivas MF. Determinants of renewable energy consumption in Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019; 26(15): 15390–15405. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04567-7
7. Omri A, Nguyen DK. On the determinants of renewable energy consumption: International evidence. Energy 2014; 72: 554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.081
8. Apergis N, Payne JE. Renewable energy, output, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: Evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Economics 2014; 42: 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.01.003
9. Apergis N, Payne JE. The causal dynamics between renewable energy, real GDP, emissions and oil prices: Evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics 2014; 46(36): 4519–4525. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.964834
10. Apergis N, Payne JE. Renewable energy, output, carbon dioxide emissions, and oil prices: Evidence from South America. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy 2015; 10(3): 281–287. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2013.853713
11. Nguyen KH, Kakinaka M. Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: Some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renewable Energy 2019; 132: 1049–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.069
12. Reboredo JC. Is there dependence and systemic risk between oil and renewable energy stock prices? Energy Economics 2015; 48: 32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.009
13. Shah IH, Hiles C, Morley B. How do oil prices, macroeconomic factors, and policies affect the market for renewable energy? Applied Energy 2018; 215: 87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.084
14. Troster V, Shahbaz M, Uddin GS. Renewable energy, oil prices, and economic activity: A Granger-causality in quantiles analysis. Energy Economics 2018; 70: 440–452. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.029
15. Hanif I. Impact of fossil fuels energy consumption, energy policies, and urban sprawl on carbon emissions in East Asia and the Pacific: A panel investigation. Energy Strategy Reviews 2018; 21: 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2018.04.006
16. Solarin SA. An environmental impact assessment of fossil fuel subsidies in emerging and developing economies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2020; 85: 106443. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106443
17. Jordà Ò. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review 2005; 95(1): 161–182. doi: 10.1257/0002828053828518
18. Sadorsky P. Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Economics 2009; 31(3): 456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.12.010
19. Azad AK, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, et al. Modeling of renewable energy economy in Australia. Energy Procedia 2014; 61: 1902–1906. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.238
20. Murshed M, Tanha MM. Oil price shocks and renewable energy transition: Empirical evidence from net oil-importing South Asian economies. Energy, Ecology, and Environment 2020; 6: 183–203. doi: 10.1007/s40974-020-00168-0
21. Aguirre M, Ibikunle G. Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis. Energy Policy 2014; 69: 374–384. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.036
22. Payne JE. The causal dynamics between US renewable energy consumption, output, emissions, and oil prices. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2012; 7(4): 323–330. doi: 10.1080/15567249.2011.595248
23. Damette O, Marques AC. Renewable energy drivers: A panel cointegration approach. Applied Economics 2019; 51(26): 2793–2806. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2018.1558359
24. Kilian L. Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. The American Economic Review 2009; 99(3): 1053–1069. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.3.1053
25. Marçal EF, de Prince D, Zimmermann B, et al. Assessing global economic activity linkages: The role played by United States, Germany and China. EconomiA 2020; 21(1): 38–56. doi: 10.1016/j.econ.2020.01.001
26. Auerbach AJ, Gorodnichenko Y. Corrigendum: Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2013; 5(3): 320–322. doi: 10.1257/pol.5.3.320
27. Romer CD, Romer DH. New evidence on the aftermath of financial crises in advanced countries. American Economic Review 2017; 107(10): 3072–3118. doi: 10.1257/aer.20150320
28. Stock JH, Watson MW. Why has U.S. inflation become harder to forecast? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 2007; 39(s1): 3–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00014.x
Copyright (c) 2023 Vithyea You
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
