Fostering a greener workplace: Assessing the impact of green human resource and low carbon behavior
Abstract
Businesses in China are embarking on a transformative agenda, as reflected in their environmental performance, which signals a strategic shift towards fostering sustainability initiatives in the workplace. Accordingly, the research explores how green human resource management, organizational commitment, and green innovation climate drive low-carbon behavior and environmental performance. The research gathered 580 responses from senior staff among Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. The partial least square structural model was employed to assess the study hypothesis. Key study findings are enumerated: First, green human resource management boosts green organizational commitment, green innovation climate, and low-carbon behavior. Second, the data showed that a green innovation climate and organizational commitment enhance low-carbon behavior. Third, according to the study, low-carbon promotes environmental performance. Fourth, the paper analysis showed that low-carbon mediated the connection between green human resources and low-carbon behavior. Fifth, this research outcome highlighted that environmental knowledge moderates the linkage between low-carbon behavior and environmental performance. This finding enriches the debate on green human resource management and how to promote low-carbon behavior and environmental performance.
References
1. Amin A, Dogan E. The role of economic policy uncertainty in the energy-environment nexus for China: Evidence from the novel dynamic simulations method. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 292: 112865. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112865
2. Liu H, Zafar MW, Sinha A, et al. The path to sustainable environment: Do environmental taxes and governance matter? Sustainable Development. 2023; 31(4): 2278-2290. doi: 10.1002/sd.2505
3. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Sampene AK, et al. The Effect of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Corporate Environmental Performance: Does Supply Chain Competitive Advantage Matter? SSRN Electronic Journal. 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4599705
4. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Saljoughipour S, et al. Stimulating environmental performance through green human resource practice: Does green transformational leadership matter? Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2023; 7(1): 2127. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v7i1.2127
5. Subramanian N, Suresh M. Green organizational culture in manufacturing SMEs: an analysis of causal relationships. International Journal of Manpower. 2023; 44(5): 789-809. doi: 10.1108/ijm-09-2021-0557
6. Piwowar-Sulej K, Kołodziej I. Organizational practices promoting employees’ pro-environmental behaviors in a Visegrad Group country: How much does company ownership matter? PLOS ONE. 2022; 17(2): e0261547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261547
7. Niazi UI, Nisar QA, Nasir N, et al. Green HRM, green innovation and environmental performance: the role of green transformational leadership and green corporate social responsibility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023; 30(15): 45353-45368. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25442-6
8. Veerasamy U, Joseph MS, Parayitam S. Green Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behavior: Participation and Involvement, and Training and Development as Moderators. South Asian J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v7i1.2127
9. Khan SAR, Ahmad Z, Sheikh AA, et al. Green technology adoption paving the way toward sustainable performance in circular economy: a case of Pakistani small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Innovation Science. 2023; 16(5): 801-822. doi: 10.1108/ijis-10-2022-0199
10. Tjahjadi B, Soewarno N, Mustikaningtiyas F. Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon. 2021; 7(3): e06453. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453
11. Han H, Hyun SS. Fostering customers’ pro-environmental behavior at a museum. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2016; 25(9): 1240-1256. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1259318
12. Rahman I, Reynolds D. Predicting green hotel behavioral intentions using a theory of environmental commitment and sacrifice for the environment. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2016; 52: 107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.09.007
13. Amoah A, Addoah T. Does environmental knowledge drive pro-environmental behavior in developing countries? Evidence from households in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020; 23(2): 2719-2738. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00698-x
14. Cheng KW, Osman S, Jusoh ZM, et al. The Significant Relationships Between Attitude, Descriptive Norm, Injunctive Norm, Environmental Knowledge, And Households’ Intention to Practise Solid Waste Segregation-At-Source. Resmilitaris. 2023; 13: 1470-1481.
15. Liobikienė G, Poškus MS. The Importance of Environmental Knowledge for Private and Public Sphere Pro-Environmental Behavior: Modifying the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Sustainability. 2019; 11(12): 3324. doi: 10.3390/su11123324
16. Sigit DV, Azrai EP, Suryanda A, et al. Students’ Knowledge, Awareness, and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Urban to Design Climate Change Book Serials. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment. 2021; 24(5): 509-517. doi: 10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.5.509
17. Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P, et al. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Cornell University Press; 2000.
18. Karmoker K, Kona FA, Oyshi AH, et al. Effects of Green Human Resource Management on Employee Green Behavior: Moderating Role of Employee Environmental Knowledge. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy. 2021; 10(2): 64-80. doi: 10.18488/journal.26.2021.102.64.80
19. Shoaib M, Abbas Z, Yousaf M, et al. The role of GHRM practices towards organizational commitment: A mediation analysis of green human capital. Cogent Business & Management. 2021; 8(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1870798
20. Barney J, Wright M, Ketchen DJ. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management. 2001; 27(6): 625-641. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700601
21. Amjad F, Abbas W, Zia-UR-Rehman M, et al. Effect of green human resource management practices on organizational sustainability: the mediating role of environmental and employee performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11307-9
22. Aslam S, Elmagrhi MH, Rehman RU, et al. Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: The mediating role of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020; 30(4): 1655-1673. doi: 10.1002/bse.2700
23. Aidara S, Mamun AA, Nasir NAM, et al. Competitive Advantages of the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Competencies and Economic Sustainability Performance. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2): 864. doi: 10.3390/su13020864
24. Elshaer IA, Azazz AMS, Fayyad S. Green Management and Sustainable Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Hospitality Businesses: Moderating the Role of an Employee’s Pro-Environmental Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3): 2244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032244
25. Jamshed S, Naz S, Ali Q, et al. Psychological Green Climate and pro-Environmental Behaviors: An Efficacious Drive towards Environmental Performance in China. Curr. Psychol. 2021; 1-16.
26. Ansari NY, Farrukh M, Raza A. Green human resource management and employees pro‐environmental behaviors: Examining the underlying mechanism. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2020; 28(1): 229-238. doi: 10.1002/csr.2044
27. Shah N, Soomro BA. Effects of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Green Innovation and Behavior. Manag. Decis. 2023; 61: 290-312. doi:10.1108/MD-07-2021-0869/FULL/XML
28. Meng J, Murad M, Li C, et al. Green Lifestyle: A Tie between Green Human Resource Management Practices and Green Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Sustainability. 2022; 15(1): 44. doi: 10.3390/su15010044
29. Guo Y, Wang L, Chen Y. Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation: The Mediating Effect of Supply Chain Learning. Sage Open. 2020; 10(1). doi: 10.1177/2158244019898798
30. Meirun T, Makhloufi L, Ghozali Hassan M. Environmental Outcomes of Green Entrepreneurship Harmonization. Sustainability. 2020; 12(24): 10615. doi: 10.3390/su122410615
31. Sampene AK, Li C, Khan A, et al. Yes! I want to be an entrepreneur: A study on university students’ entrepreneurship intentions through the theory of planned behavior. Current Psychology. 2022; 42(25): 21578-21596. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03161-4
32. Owusu EA, Zhou L, Kwasi Sampene A, et al. Fostering Environmental Performance Via Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Innovation Initiatives: Examining the Moderating Influence of Competitive Advantage. Sage Open. 2024; 14(2). doi: 10.1177/21582440241242847
33. Cao H, Chen Z. The driving effect of internal and external environment on green innovation strategy-The moderating role of top management’s environmental awareness. Nankai Business Review International. 2019; 10(3): 342-361. doi: 10.1108/nbri-05-2018-0028
34. Wu F, Cui D, Yang FH. To learn or to have fun? How paratexts of entertainment education programs affect fans’ informal learning. Chinese Journal of Communication. 2023; 17(2): 206-225. doi: 10.1080/17544750.2023.2253333
35. Fazal‐e‐Hasan SM, Ahmadi H, Sekhon H, et al. The role of green innovation and hope in employee retention. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022; 32(1): 220-239. doi: 10.1002/bse.3126
36. Siregar ZME, Sujana FR, Pranowo AS, Supriadi YN. Job Autonomy and Innovative Work Behavior of Marketing Employees in the Automotive Industry in Indonesia: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment. Calitatea. 2021; 22: 97-102.
37. Sarmad M, Pirzada MA, Iqbal R. Fostering extra-role green behavior through green HRM practices: mediating role of green absorptive capacity. International Journal of Manpower. 2023; 44(8): 1535-1552. doi: 10.1108/ijm-10-2021-0592
38. Wang Y, Wang F, Sang P, et al. Analyzing factors affecting developers’ behavior towards the adoption of prefabricated buildings in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021; 23(10): 14245-14263. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01265-8
39. Maydiantoro A, Tusianah R, Isnainy UCAS, et al. A Literature Review of the Three Elements of Organizational Commitment: The Meaning of the Contribution Score Average. Wseas transactions on business and economics. 2021; 18: 679-689. doi: 10.37394/23207.2021.18.67
40. Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, et al. Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2002; 61(1): 20-52. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
41. Raza SA, Khan KA. Impact of green human resource practices on hotel environmental performance: the moderating effect of environmental knowledge and individual green values. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2022; 34(6): 2154-2175. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-05-2021-0553
42. Fatima M, Izhar Z, Kazmi ZA. Organizational Justice and Employee Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment. SEISENSE Journal of Management. 2020; 3(3): 12-22. doi: 10.33215/sjom.v3i3.334
43. Darvishmotevali M, Altinay L. Green HRM, environmental awareness and green behaviors: The moderating role of servant leadership. Tourism Management. 2022; 88: 104401. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104401
44. Nisar S, Khan NR, Khan MR. Determinant analysis of employee attitudes toward pro-environmental behavior in textile firms of Pakistan: a serial mediation approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2021; 32(5): 1064-1094. doi: 10.1108/meq-11-2020-0270
45. Saeed BB, Afsar B, Hafeez S, et al. Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2018; 26(2): 424-438. doi: 10.1002/csr.1694
46. Small A, Russell SV, Paavola J. Corporate Environmental Sustainability and Ecosystem Services: A 21st Century Solution? Academy of Management Proceedings. 2019; 2019(1): 12858. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2019.239
47. Sampene AK, Li C, Oteng Agyeman F, et al. Employees’ behavioral action towards corporate environmental performance: The moderating effect of moral reflectiveness. Heliyon. 2024; 10(6): e28075. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28075
48. Syafri W, Prabowo H, Ashari NURS, Muafi M. The Impact of Workplace Green Behavior and Green Innovation on Green Performance of SMEs: A Case Study in Indonesia. J. Asian Financ. 2021; 8: 365-0374. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0365
49. Ming Y, Deng H, Wu X. The negative effect of air pollution on people’s pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research. 2022; 142: 72-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.044
50. Kim M, Lee SM. Drivers and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2022; 34(5): 1854-1881. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-09-2021-1094
51. Han H, Moon H, Hyun SS. Uncovering the determinants of pro-environmental consumption for green hotels and green restaurants. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2019; 32(4): 1581-1603. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-04-2019-0354
52. Tan Pham N, Tučková Z, Phu Thi Phan Q. Sectoral analysis of the effectiveness of bank risk capital in the visegrad group countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2019; 20(3): 446-465. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2019.9659
53. Khan A, Hussain S, Sampene AK. Investing in green intellectual capital to enhance green corporate image under the Influence of green innovation climate: A Case of Chinese Entrepreneurial SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 418: 138177. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138177
54. Riva F, Magrizos S, Rubel MRB. Investigating the link between managers’ green knowledge and leadership style, and their firms’ environmental performance: The mediation role of green creativity. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021; 30(7): 3228-3240. doi: 10.1002/bse.2799
55. Paço A, Lavrador T. Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviors towards energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017; 197: 384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.100
56. Rafiq F, Chishty SK, Adil M. Explanatory or Dispositional Optimism: Which Trait Predicts Eco-Friendly Tourist Behavior? Sustainability. 2022; 14(5): 2994. doi: 10.3390/su14052994
57. Cheng Y, Liu H, Yuan Y, et al. What Makes Employees Green Advocates? Exploring the Effects of Green Human Resource Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3): 1807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031807
58. Halis M, Halis M. Impact of energy management systems, pro-environmental energy consumption, and awareness on performance outcomes: a serial mediated-moderated modeling with PLS-SEM. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 29(18): 26910-26921. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17867-8
59. Ashraf SF, Li C, Wattoo MU, et al. Green horizons: Unleashing green innovation through green business strategies and competencies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024; 33(5): 4233-4251. doi: 10.1002/bse.3696
60. Ren S, Jiang K, Tang G. Leveraging green HRM for firm performance: The joint effects of CEO environmental belief and external pollution severity and the mediating role of employee environmental commitment. Human Resource Management. 2021; 61(1): 75-90. doi: 10.1002/hrm.22079
61. Fatoki O. Environmental Orientation and Green Competitive Advantage of Hospitality Firms in South Africa: Mediating Effect of Green Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(4): 223. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7040223
62. Makhloufi L, Laghouag AA, Meirun T, et al. Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource‐based view and environmental policy perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021; 31(1): 425-444. doi: 10.1002/bse.2902
63. Iqbal S, Akhtar S, Anwar F, et al. Linking green innovation performance and green innovative human resource practices in SMEs; a moderation and mediation analysis using PLS-SEM. Current Psychology. 2021; 42(13): 11250-11267. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02403-1
64. Lange F. Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. Behavior Research Methods. 2022; 55(2): 600-622. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01825-4
65. Shehzad MU, Zhang J, Latif KF, et al. Do green entrepreneurial orientation and green knowledge management matter in the pursuit of ambidextrous green innovation: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 388: 135971. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135971
66. Úbeda‐García M, Marco‐Lajara B, Zaragoza‐Sáez PC, et al. Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021; 29(1): 32-45. doi: 10.1002/csr.2171
67. Park YS, Konge L, Artino AR. The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Academic Medicine. 2020; 95(5): 690-694. doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003093
68. Miller R, Brewer J. Sampling, Snowball: Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations. AZ Soc. Res. A Dict. key Soc. Sci. Res. Concepts. 2003; 274.
69. Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research. 2020; 109: 101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
70. Ma Z, Oteng Agyeman F, Kwasi Sampene A, et al. Senior High School Teachers’ Preference for Professional Development: A Case Study in the Central Region of Ghana Under the Current Free Senior High School Policy. Sage Open. 2023; 13(3). doi: 10.1177/21582440231185116
71. Sampene AK, Li C, Wiredu J, et al. Examining the nexus between social cognition, biospheric values, moral norms, corporate environmental responsibility and pro-environmental behavior. Does environmental knowledge matter? Current Psychology. 2023; 43(7): 6549-6569. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04832-6
72. Cai L, Kwasi Sampene A, Khan A, et al. Does Entrepreneur Moral Reflectiveness Matter? Pursing Low-Carbon Emission Behavior among SMEs through the Relationship between Environmental Factors, Entrepreneur Personal Concept, and Outcome Expectations. Sustainability. 2022; 14(2): 808. doi: 10.3390/su14020808
73. Harman HH. Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago press; 1976.
74. Manley SC, Hair JF, Williams RI, et al. Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2020; 17(4): 1805-1825. doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00687-6
75. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2014; 43(1): 115-135. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
76. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18(1): 39. doi: 10.2307/3151312
77. Elshaer IA, Sobaih AEE, Aliedan M, et al. The Effect of Green Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance in Small Tourism Enterprises: Mediating Role of Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Sustainability. 2021; 13(4): 1956. doi: 10.3390/su13041956
78. Aboramadan M, Kundi YM, Becker A. Green Human Resource Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Effects on Employee Green Behavior and the Role of Perceived Green Organizational Support. Pers. Rev. 2021. doi:10.1108/PR-02-2021-0078/FULL/XML
79. Fawehinmi O, Yusliza MY, Wan Kasim WZ, et al. Exploring the Interplay of Green Human Resource Management, Employee Green Behavior, and Personal Moral Norms. Sage Open. 2020; 10(4). doi: 10.1177/2158244020982292
80. Ojo AO, Tan CNL, Alias M. Linking green HRM practices to environmental performance through pro-environment behavior in the information technology sector. Social Responsibility Journal. 2020; 18(1): 1-18. doi: 10.1108/srj-12-2019-0403
81. Mohiuddin M, Hosseini E, Faradonbeh SB, et al. Achieving Human Resource Management Sustainability in Universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(2): 928. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020928
82. Sampene AK, Li C, Esther Agyeiwaa O. Green human resource to stimulate low carbon behavior through the mediation role of innovation practices and organizational commitment. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2024; 8(4): 364-380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2024.09.001
83. Qing L, Chun D, Dagestani AA, et al. Does Proactive Green Technology Innovation Improve Financial Performance? Evidence from Listed Companies with Semiconductor Concepts Stock in China. Sustainability. 2022; 14(8): 4600. doi: 10.3390/su14084600
84. Song S, Hossin MA, Yin X, et al. Accelerating Green Innovation Performance from the Relations of Network Potential, Absorptive Capacity, and Environmental Turbulence. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14): 7765. doi: 10.3390/su13147765
85. Sun D, Kyere F, Sampene AK, et al. An investigation on the role of electric vehicles in alleviating environmental pollution: evidence from five leading economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 30(7): 18244-18259. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23386-x
86. Weng HH, Chen JS, Chen PC. Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective. Sustainability. 2015; 7(5): 4997-5026. doi: 10.3390/su7054997
87. Kim YJ, Kim WG, Choi HM, et al. The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2019; 76: 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.007
88. MacInnes S, Grün B, Dolnicar S. Habit drives sustainable tourist behavior. Annals of Tourism Research. 2022; 92: 103329. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2021.103329
89. Wasaya A, Saleem MA, Ahmad J, et al. Impact of green trust and green perceived quality on green purchase intentions: a moderation study. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021; 23(9): 13418-13435. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01219-6
90. Saleem M, Qadeer F, Mahmood F, et al. Inculcation of Green Behavior in Employees: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(1): 331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010331
91. Shahzad M, Qu Y, Zafar AU, et al. Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021; 30(8): 4206-4222. doi: 10.1002/bse.2865
92. Latif B, Ong TS, Meero A, et al. Employee-Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB): The Moderating Role of CSR Skepticism and CSR Authenticity. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3): 1380. doi: 10.3390/su14031380
93. Shao X, Zhong Y, Liu W, et al. Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 296: 113189. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113189
94. Channa NA, Tariq B, Samo AH, et al. Predicting consumers’ intentions to purchase eco-friendly athletic wear in a moderated model of individual green values and gender. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. 2021; 23(2): 410-436. doi: 10.1108/ijsms-12-2020-0215
95. Anwar N, Nik Mahmood NH, Yusliza MY, et al. Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 256: 120401. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401
96. Elshaer IA, Azazz AMS, Fayyad S. Green Human Resources and Innovative Performance in Small- and Medium-Sized Tourism Enterprises: A Mediation Model Using PLS-SEM Data Analysis. Mathematics. 2023; 11(3): 711. doi: 10.3390/math11030711
97. Jeong Y, Kim SK, Yu JG. Determinants of Behavioral Intentions in the Context of Sport Tourism with the Aim of Sustaining Sporting Destinations. Sustainability. 2019; 11(11): 3073. doi: 10.3390/su11113073
98. Pham NT, Vo Thanh T, Tučková Z, et al. The role of green human resource management in driving hotel’s environmental performance: Interaction and mediation analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2020; 88: 102392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102392
Copyright (c) 2024 Agyemang Kwasi Sampene, John Wiredu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
