The contributions of corporate social responsibility in textile and apparel industry toward consumers’ purchase intention: Perceived quality and corporate image as mediators
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plays a pivotal role in the development of enterprises and entire industries, serving as a communication bridge between business organizations and consumers. Grounded in the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), this study aims to investigate the contribution of CSR in the textile and apparel industry to consumers’ purchase intentions, with perceived quality and corporate image as mediators. To achieve this objective, the study first formulates hypotheses and a theoretical model based on relevant works. Subsequently, through an extensive review of literature and interview surveys, key indicators for CSR, perceived quality, corporate image, and purchase intention are identified, along with their corresponding scales. These scales are then distributed to consumers to collect questionnaire data, which is further integrated into a stepwise regression model and mediating model to test the theoretical model. The results provide insights into the contribution of various dimensions of CSR to consumers’ purchase intentions and validate the role of perceived quality and corporate image as mediators. There are two contributions to this work: (1) unveiling the important role of perceived quality and corporate image in connecting CSR and consumers’ purchase intention, offering a novel theoretical framework for the study of sustainable development in the textile and apparel industry and other industries or settings. (2) furnishing the textile and apparel industry with insights to better comprehend and respond to the relationship between CSR, perceived quality, and purchase intention, thereby achieving more substantial economic and social benefits.
References
1. Kozlowski A. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Apparel Industry: A Multiple Case Study Analysis. Ryerson University; 2012.
2. Dixit P, Lal RC. A critical analysis of Indian textile industry: an insight into inclusive growth and social responsibility. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2019; 88(4): 53-61.
3. Fomburn CJ. Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1996.
4. Szewczyk M. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Textile and Apparel Industry: Barriers and Challenges. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership. 2017; 3(4): 67. doi: 10.12775/jcrl.2016.024
5. Thorisdottir TS, Johannsdottir L. Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21): 9167. doi: 10.3390/su12219167
6. Leonas KK. Textile and apparel industry addresses emerging issue of microfiber pollution. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management. 2018; 10(4).
7. Carroll AB, Shabana KM. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010; 12(1): 85-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
8. Yadlapalli A, Rahman S. Developing a consensus definition of CSR. In: Proceedings of the 27th Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference “Managing on the Edge”; 4–6 December 2013; Hobart, Australia. p. 28.
9. Bowen HR. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press; 2013. doi: 10.1353/book29080
10. Contrafatto M, Ferguson J, Power D, et al. Understanding power-related strategies and initiatives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2019; 33(3): 559-587. doi: 10.1108/aaaj-06-2018-3529
11. Carroll AB. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review. 1979; 4(4): 497. doi: 10.2307/257850
12. Zhang MH, Li SY. The Theory and Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility in China. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences Edition). 2009; 5: 94-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0209.2009.05.013
13. Zhang TH, Wu MG. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention. Business Research. 2012; 12: 33-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-148X.2012.12.006
14. Paul E, Gibson J, Smith P. Influential Article Review-The Global Pyramid Model of CSR-What is the Best Way to Perform Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics. 2019; 16(6): 1-27.
15. Ben Noamene T, Elouadi S. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): An Empirical Examination in the Tunisian Context. International Business Research. 2015; 8(10). doi: 10.5539/ibr.v8n10p117
16. Lee SS, Kim Y, Roh T. Modified Pyramid of CSR for Corporate Image and Customer Loyalty: Focusing on the Moderating Role of the CSR Experience. Sustainability. 2019; 11(17): 4745. doi: 10.3390/su11174745
17. Committee for Economic Development. Social responsibilities of business corporations. Committee for Economic Development; 1971.
18. Elkington J. The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases. 1997; 2: 49-66.
19. Maignan I, Ralston D. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies. 2002; 33: 497–514. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028
20. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1977; 10(2): 130–132.
21. Wu DY, Xin YJ. Research on the Impact of Corporate Consumer Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention: Based on the Perspective of Rational Behavior Theory. Consumer Economy. 2018; 34(3): 8. doi: CNKI:SUN:XFJY.0.2018-03-008
22. Wu MG. Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention from the Perspective of TRA Theory. Modern Commerce and Industry. 2011; 23(9): 20-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3198.2011.09.011
23. He T. Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention: Based on the Electronics Industry. Southwest Jiaotong University; 2023.
24. Chao WP. Empirical Study on Factors Influencing Consumer Social Responsibility Consumption Behavior. Huazhong Agricultural University; 2014.
25. Hale JL, Householder BJ, Greene KL. The theory of reasoned action. In: The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Sage Publications; 2002. pp. 259-286. doi: 10.4135/9781412976046.n14
26. Breckler SJ, Wiggins EC. Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of experimental social psychology. 1989; 25(3): 253-271. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90022-X
27. Olson JC. Research of perceiving quality. Emerging Concepts in Marketing. 1972; 9: 220-226.
28. Holbrook M, Corfman K. Quality and value in the efficiency of markets for consumer products. Journal of Consumer Research. 1985; 11(2): 708-718.
29. Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A. The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing. 1996; 60(2): 31-46. doi: 10.1177/002224299606000203
30. Kirmani A, Baumgartner H. Reference points used in quality and value judgements. Marketing Letters. 2000; 11: 299-310. doi: 10.1023/A:1008129011202
31. Wang CY, Yu WP. The Boundary of the Role of Food Corporate Social Responsibility Redemption Scandal Brands: The Moderating Effect of Perceived Quality and Scandal Scope. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2018; 8: 12. doi: CNKI:SUN:CJLC.0.2018-08-009
32. Xin J. On the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Equity: A Perspective Based on Consumer CSR Perception. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition). 2012; 29(6): 93-99. doi: CNKI:SUN:SZDS.0.2012-06-016
33. Han N, Li J. The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand awareness: an analysis using information transmission as a moderating variable. Technology and Economics. 2014; 33(2): 9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2014.02.017
34. Lu D, Samart P, Kou Y. Attribution of Corporate Social Responsibility from a Consumer Perspective. Journal of Management. 2010; 2010(6): 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2010.06.012
35. Zhang HB, Li CL, Wei S. The Impact of Perceived Quality and Perceived Value of Online Customers on Purchase Intention: Based on the Perspective of Consumer Heterogeneity. Enterprise Economics. 2020; 39(5): 9.
36. Calvo-Porral C, Lévy-Mangin JP. Store brands’ purchase intention: Examining the role of perceived quality. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2017; 23(2): 90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.10.001
37. Avotra AARN, Chengang Y, Wei X, et al. Struggling with Business Corporate Cynical Impression? Powerful Methods of CSR to Enhance Corporate Image and Consumer Purchase Intention. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021; 9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.726727
38. Gotsi M, Wilson AM. Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 2001; 6(1): 24-30. doi: 10.1108/13563280110381189
39. Herbohn K, Walker J, Loo HYM. Corporate social responsibility: The link between sustainability disclosure and sustainability performance. Abacus. 2014; 50(4): 422-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12036
40. Huang CC, Yen SW, Liu CY, Huang PC. The relationship among corporate social responsibility, service quality, corporate image and purchase intention. International Journal of Organizational Innovation. 2014; 6(3).
41. Bataineh AQ. The Impact of Perceived e-WOM on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Corporate Image. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 2015; 7(1). doi: 10.5539/ijms.v7n1p126
42. Lin L, Lu C. The influence of corporate image, relationship marketing, and trust on purchase intention: the moderating effects of word‐of‐mouth. Tourism Review. 2010; 65(3): 16-34. doi: 10.1108/16605371011083503
43. Jeon JH. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Corporate Image and Purchase Intention. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles. 2011; 35(5): 547-560. doi: 10.5850/jksct.2011.35.5.547
44. Lee J, Lee Y. Effects of multi-brand company’s CSR activities on purchase intention through a mediating role of corporate image and brand image. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. 2018; 22(3): 387-403. doi: 10.1108/jfmm-08-2017-0087
45. Maignan I, Ralston DA. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies. 2002; 33(3): 497-514. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028
46. Jin LY. Empirical Study on the Evaluation Index System of Corporate Social Responsibility Movement - Consumer Perspective. China Industrial Economy. 2006; (6): 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2006.06.015
47. Jiang MH, Guo L. Empirical Study on Store Image and Perceived Quality of Private Brands. Economic Science. 2003; 4: 10. doi: CNKI:SUN:JJKX.0-2003-04-012
48. Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D. Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research. 1991; 28(3): 307-319. doi: 10.1177/002224379102800305
49. Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Sever JM. The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management. 2000; 7(4): 241-255. doi: 10.1057/bm.2000.10
50. Boulding W, Kalra A, Staelin R, et al. A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing Research. 1993; 30(1): 7-27. doi: 10.1177/002224379303000102
51. Martin CA, Bush AJ. Do role models influence teenagers’ purchase intentions and behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2000; 17(5): 441-453. doi: 10.1108/07363760010341081
52. Zeithaml VA. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing. 1988; 52(3): 2-22. doi: 10.1177/002224298805200302
53. Shi T. Scientific determination of sample size in sampling surveys. Journal of Mount Taishan Medical College. 2010.
Copyright (c) 2024 Yan Cheng, Yan Zhao, Yu Zhao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
