Brown vs green energy sources and resource productivity: The role of human capital and technology transfer in developing economies
Abstract
This study determined the impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy consumption on natural resource productivity alongside human capital and technology transfer roles for 40 selected developing economies. The study relied on a dataset sourced between 1991 and 2021. The study applied the method of moments quantile regression (MMQREG) procedure for the analyses while ensuring inferential robustness through the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), dynamic OLS (DOLS), and Driscoll-Kraay (D-K) methods. Empirically, the study revealed that an increase in brown energy consumption exhausted resource productivity from the lower to the upper quantiles. In contrast, green energy utilisation enhanced resource productivity from the lower to the higher quantiles. Also, while human capital adversely affected resource productivity for both energy means, technology transfer positively impacted it from the lower to the upper quantiles. Likewise, inferences from the DOLS, FMOLS, and D-K techniques revealed similar findings. However, despite non-renewable energy being the dominant means of energy in these developing economies, the size of its adverse impact on resource productivity falls short of the increasing effect of renewable energy across all quantiles. Also, the magnitude of the negative impact of human capital on resource productivity is marginally more substantial with non-renewable energy. In contrast, the robustness of the enhancing impact of technology transfer is slightly more with renewable energy.
References
1. Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, et al. The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: A global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renewable Energy. 2019; 133: 685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052
2. Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, et al. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020; 57: 102138. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
3. Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, et al. The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review. 2017; 62(04): 929-957. doi: 10.1142/s0217590817400331
4. Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Owusu PA. The causal nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and agricultural ecosystem—an econometric approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24(2): 1608-1618. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7908-2
5. Adom PK, Bekoe W, Amuakwa-Mensah F, et al. Carbon dioxide emissions, economic growth, industrial structure, and technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Ghana, Senegal, and Morocco on the causal dynamics. Energy. 2012; 47(1): 314-325. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.025
6. Zhang C, Lin Y. Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China. Energy Policy. 2012; 49: 488-498. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.048
7. Aladejare SA. Energy utilisation, economic prosperity and environmental quality in West Africa: is there an asymmetric nexus? International Journal of Energy, Environment, and Economics. 2020; 28(3): 166-191.
8. Baek J. Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Ecological Indicators. 2016; 66: 352-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.059
9. Sarkar MSK, Sadeka S, Sikdar MMH, Zaman B. Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: trends and policy implications. Asia Pacific Journal of Energy and Environment. 2015; 2(3):175-182.
10. Tang CF, Tan BW. The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy. 2015; 79: 447-454. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033
11. Aladejare SA, Nyiputen IR. Ecological response to Industrialisation drivers in Africa. Environemental Development. 2022; 47: 100896.
12. Tang CF, Tan BW. The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy. 2015; 79: 447-454. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033
13. Aladejare SA, Ebi BO, Ubi SP. Quality of life and the fundamental issues to be addressed in west African countries. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development. 2022; 43(2): 225-252.
14. Aladejare SA, Osagu FN. Assessing quality of life from the lens of sustainability in Africa. Researchsquare; 2023.
15. BP. British Petroleum statistical review of world energy. BP; 2022.
16. OWD. Our World in Data. OWD; 2022.
17. Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü. The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 54: 838-845. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
18. Ellabban O, Abu-Rub H, Blaabjerg F. Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014; 39: 748-764. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113
19. Wei X, Liu J, Wei T, et al. High Proportion Renewable Energy Supply and Demand Structure Model in 2050. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies. 2017; 5(2): 163-169. doi: 10.18178/jocet.2017.5.2.363
20. Paramati SR, Sinha A, Dogan E. The significance of renewable energy use for economic output and environmental protection: evidence from the Next 11 developing economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24(15): 13546-13560. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8985-6
21. Paramati SR, Apergis N, Ummalla M. Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018; 25(2): 1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0552-7
22. Aladejare SA. Resource Price, Macroeconomic Distortions, and Public Outlay: Evidence from Oil-Exporting Countries. International Economic Journal. 2018; 32(2): 199-218. doi: 10.1080/10168737.2018.1481128
23. Abid N, Ceci F, Razzaq A. Inclusivity of information and communication technology in ecological governance for sustainable resources management in G10 countries. Resources Policy. 2023; 81: 103378. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103378
24. Aladejare SA. Renewable energy and ecological sustainability in Africa: Does foreign debt and financial globalisation matter? Researchsquare; 2023. doi.org/: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2723366/v2
25. IMF—International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database April 2023. IMF; 2023.
26. Aladejare SA. Are public spending determinants significant in per capita budget spending decisions in Nigeria? International Journal of Finance & Economics. 2022; 27(1): 192-206. doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2146
27. CGEP—Centre on Global Energy Policy. Energy and development in a changing world: A framework for the 21th century. CGEP; 2019.
28. Lucas R. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988; 22: 3–42.
29. Romer PM. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990; 98(5, Part 2): S71-S102. doi: 10.1086/261725
30. Barro RJ. Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991; 106(2): 407. doi: 10.2307/2937943
31. Sala-i-Martin X. Economic growth, cross-sectional regressions and the empirics of economic growth. European Economic Review. 1994; 38: 739–747.
32. Rahman MM, Velayutham E. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus: New evidence from South Asia. Renewable Energy. 2020; 147: 399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.007
33. Maji IK, Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus: A fresh evidence from West Africa. Energy Reports. 2020; 5: 384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.005
34. Awodumi OB, Adewuyi AO. The role of non-renewable energy consumption in economic growth and carbon emission: Evidence from oil producing economies in Africa. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2020; 27: 100434. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100434
35. Taşkın D, Vardar G, Okan B. Does renewable energy promote green economic growth in OECD countries? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2020; 11(4): 771-798. doi: 10.1108/sampj-04-2019-0192
36. Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Chittedi KR, et al. The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index. Energy. 2020; 207: 118162. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118162
37. Saidi K, Omri A. The impact of renewable energy on carbon emissions and economic growth in 15 major renewable energy-consuming countries. Environmental Research. 2020; 186: 109567. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109567
38. Chen C, Pinar M, Stengos T. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus: Evidence from a threshold model. Energy Policy. 2020; 139: 111295. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111295
39. Anser MK, Shabbir MS, Tabash MI, et al. Do renewable energy sources improve clean environmental-economic growth? Empirical investigation from South Asian economies. Energy Exploration & Exploitation. 2021; 39(5): 1491-1514. doi: 10.1177/01445987211002278
40. Baz K, Cheng J, Xu D, et al. Asymmetric impact of fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption on economic growth: A nonlinear technique. Energy. 2021; 226: 120357. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120357
41. Mohsin M, Kamran HW, Atif Nawaz M, et al. Assessing the impact of transition from nonrenewable to renewable energy consumption on economic growth-environmental nexus from developing Asian economies. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 284: 111999. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111999
42. Yikun Z, Gul A, Saleem S, et al. The relationship between renewable energy sources and sustainable economic growth: evidence from SAARC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 28(25): 33390-33399. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12795-z
43. Li Z, Leong LW, Aldoseri MMN, et al. Examining the role of sustainability and natural resources management in improving environmental quality: Evidence from Asian countries. Resources Policy. 2023; 103136.
44. Usman FK, Adeyinka OB. Effect of human capital development on economic growth of ECOWAS countries. Advances in sciences and Humanities. 2019; 5(1): 27-42.
45. Glawe L, Wagner H. The role of institutional quality and human capital for economic growth across Chinese provinces – a dynamic panel data approach. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 2020; 18(3): 209-227. doi: 10.1080/14765284.2020.1755140
46. Ding X, Huang Y, Gao W, et al. A Comparative Study of the Impacts of Human Capital and Physical Capital on Building Sustainable Economies at Different Stages of Economic Development. Energies. 2021; 14(19): 6259. doi: 10.3390/en14196259
47. Rahim S, Murshed M, Umarbeyli S, et al. Do natural resources abundance and human capital development promote economic growth? A study on the resource curse hypothesis in Next Eleven countries. Resources, Environment and Sustainability. 2021; 4: 100018. doi: 10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100018
48. Sonmez ED, Cemaloglu N. The effect of education as a component of human capital on economic growth: A panel VAR analysis. Eurasian Journal of Education Research. 2021; 93: 135-164.
49. Shidong L, Chupradit S, Maneengam A, et al. The moderating role of human capital and renewable energy in promoting economic development in G10 economies: Evidence from CUP-FM and CUP-BC methods. Renewable Energy. 2022; 189: 180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.053
50. Aladejare SA. Economic prosperity, asymmetric natural resource income, and ecological demands in resource-reliant economies. Resources Policy. 2023; 82: 103435. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103435
51. Gyedu S, Heng T, Ntarmah AH, et al. The impact of innovation on economic growth among G7 and BRICS countries: A GMM style panel vector autoregressive approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; 173: 121169. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121169
52. Ahmad M, Jiang P, Murshed M, et al. Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter? Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021; 70: 102881. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881
53. Belazreg W, Mtar K. Causal Nexus Between Innovation, Financial Development, and Economic Growth: the Case of OECD Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2021; 12(1): 310-341. doi: 10.1007/s13132-020-00628-2
54. Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, et al. Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renewable Energy. 2021; 171: 479-491. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.075
55. Skare M, Porada-Rochon M. The role of innovation in sustainable growth: A dynamic panel study on micro and macro levels 1990–2019. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022; 175: 121337. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121337
56. Fang W, Liu Z, Surya Putra AR. Role of research and development in green economic growth through renewable energy development: Empirical evidence from South Asia. Renewable Energy. 2022; 194: 1142-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.125
57. Kurniawati MA. Analysis of the impact of information communication technology on economic growth: empirical evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. 2022; 29(1): 2-18. doi: 10.1108/jabes-07-2020-0082
58. Anakpo G, Oyenubi A. Technological innovation and economic growth in Southern Africa: Application of panel dynamic OLS regression. Development Southern Africa. 2022; 39(4): 543-557. doi: 10.1080/0376835x.2022.2052017
59. Iqbal K, Sarfraz M, Khurshid. Exploring the role of information communication technology, trade, and foreign direct investment to promote sustainable economic growth: Evidence from Belt and Road Initiative economies. Sustainable Development. 2023; 31(3): 1526-1535. doi: 10.1002/sd.2464
60. Aladejare SA, & Musa MA. Does rising resources income, consumer prices, government outlay, and globalisation hinder Africa's sustainable development? International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development. 2024; 23(1): 37–62.
61. Rees WE. Eco-footprint analysis: Merits and brickbats. Ecological Economics. 2000; 32: 371–374.
62. Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP. Impact of Population Growth. Science. 1971; 171(3977): 1212-1217. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
63. World Bank. World Development Indicator. World Bank; 2023.
64. GFN. Global footprint network. GFN; 2022.
65. Feenstra RC, Inklaar R, Timmer MP. The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review. 2015; 105(10): 3150-3182. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130954
66. Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, et al. The KOF Globalisation Index—revisited. The Review of International Organizations. 2019; 14(3): 543-574. doi: 10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
67. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory. 2004; 20(03). doi: 10.1017/s0266466604203073
68. Ike GN, Usman O, Sarkodie SA. Testing the role of oil production in the environmental Kuznets curve of oil producing countries: New insights from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Science of The Total Environment. 2020; 711: 135208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135208
69. Kao C, Chiang MH. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Non-stationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2001. pp. 179–222.
70. Aladejare SA. Population Health, Infrastructure Development and FDI Inflows to Africa: A Regional Comparative Analysis. Asian Journal of Economic Modelling. 2022; 10(3): 192-206. doi: 10.55493/5009.v10i3.4568
71. Driscoll JC, Kraay AC. Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1998; 80(4): 549-560. doi: 10.1162/003465398557825
72. Aladejare SA. Does External Debt Promote Human Longevity in Developing Countries? Evidence from West African Countries. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023; 16(2): 213-237. doi: 10.1007/s40647-023-00365-1
73. Machado JAF, Santos Silva JMC. Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics. 2019; 213(1): 145-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
74. UNEP—United Nations Environment Programme. China outpacing rest of world in natural resource use. UNEP; 2023.
75. Nawaz MA, Azam MA, Bhatti MA. Natural resources depletion and economic growth: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Pakistan Journal of Economic Studies. 2019; 2(2): 58-77.
76. Fox J. ASEAN economic outlook 2023. ASEAN Briefing. Available online: www.aseanbriefing.com sourced 31/05/2023 (accessed on 5 June 2024).
77. World Bank. Brazil can be both richer and greener: World Bank Group outlines opportunities for climate action and growth. World Bank; 2023.
78. UNEP—United Nations Environment Programme. Six African countries switch to green business development for sustainable growth. UNEP; 2017.
79. World Bank. High-performance health-financing for universal health coverage: Driving sustainable, inclusive growth in the 21th century. World Bank; 2019.
80. Aladejare SA. The human well-being and environmental degradation nexus in Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023; 30(5): 12098-12113. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22911-2
Copyright (c) 2024 Samson Adeniyi Aladejare, Salihu Bobbo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submit a Paper
